Northrop Grumman Corporation
- Open
- 524.62
- Day high
- 538.96
- Day low
- 520.66
- Prev close
- 518.65
- Volume
- 1.0M
- Mkt cap
- $74.1B
- P/E (TTM)
- 16.3
- EPS (TTM)
- $32.01
- P/B
- 4.3
- P/S
- 1.7
- Yield
- 1.80%
- Per share
- $9.40
- ▼Insiders net selling -$54K over the last 3 months (0 open-market buys, 10 sales)
- 🏛Institutions mixed (13F)
Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) is a Industrials company listed on NYSE. The stock is up 0% over the past year. Over the trailing 3 months, insiders filed 0 open-market buys and 10 sales (SEC Form 4). Drillr has 34 published research articles covering NOC.
Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) financials & analyst ratings
Fundamentals (TTM)
Analyst consensus · 7 analysts
Source: exchange market data + company filings. Figures are trailing-twelve-month or as most recently reported. For informational purposes only — not investment advice.
NOC earnings date, history & EPS estimates
| Report date | EPS est | EPS actual | Surprise | Revenue | Rev. surprise |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2026 | $6.06 | $6.14 | +1.3% | $9.9B | +1.3% |
| Jan 27, 2026 | $6.98 | $7.23 | +3.6% | $11.7B | +0.8% |
| Oct 21, 2025 | $6.44 | $7.67 | +19.1% | $10.4B | -2.7% |
| Jul 22, 2025 | $6.92 | $7.11 | +2.7% | $10.4B | +2.9% |
| Apr 22, 2025 | $6.24 | $6.06 | -2.9% | $9.5B | -4.6% |
| Jan 30, 2025 | $6.35 | $6.39 | +0.6% | $10.7B | -2.5% |
| Oct 24, 2024 | $6.07 | $7.00 | +15.3% | $10.0B | -1.9% |
| Jul 25, 2024 | $5.93 | $6.36 | +7.3% | $10.2B | +2.0% |
| Apr 25, 2024 | $5.79 | $6.32 | +9.2% | $10.1B | +3.8% |
| Jan 25, 2024 | $5.75 | $6.27 | +9.0% | $10.6B | +1.9% |
| Oct 26, 2023 | $5.81 | $6.18 | +6.4% | $9.8B | +2.0% |
| Jul 27, 2023 | $5.33 | $5.34 | +0.2% | $9.6B | +2.4% |
NOC insider trading activity (SEC Form 4)
| Date | Insider | Type | Shares | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2026 | Brown Marianne Catherinedirector | Grant | 91 | $509.31 |
| Jul 1, 2026 | KRISHNA ARVINDdirector | Grant | 71 | $509.31 |
| May 21, 2026 | Ross Kimberly A.director | Grant | 349 | $552.17 |
| May 21, 2026 | WELSH MARK A IIIdirector | Grant | 349 | $552.17 |
| May 21, 2026 | Grady Christopher W.director | Grant | 349 | $552.17 |
| May 21, 2026 | ROUGHEAD GARYdirector | Grant | 349 | $552.17 |
| May 21, 2026 | Turley James Sdirector | Grant | 349 | $552.17 |
| May 21, 2026 | WINSTON MARY Adirector | Grant | 349 | $552.17 |
| May 21, 2026 | ABNEY DAVID Pdirector | Grant | 349 | $552.17 |
| May 21, 2026 | Brown Marianne Catherinedirector | Grant | 349 | $552.17 |
| May 21, 2026 | SCHOEWE THOMAS Mdirector | Grant | 349 | $552.17 |
| May 21, 2026 | KRISHNA ARVINDdirector | Grant | 349 | $552.17 |
| May 5, 2026 | WELSH MARK A IIIdirector | Sell | 3 | $571.74 |
| May 5, 2026 | WELSH MARK A IIIdirector | Sell | 2 | $574.51 |
| May 5, 2026 | WELSH MARK A IIIdirector | Sell | 43 | $570.47 |
Source: NOC SEC Form 4 filings, latest Jul 1, 2026. For informational purposes only — not investment advice.
See the full NOC insider & 13F page →NOC research & analysis
LMT, RTX, NOC: Defense Cohort After House War Powers Vote
House blocks Trump on Iran. Israel-Lebanon ceasefire. LMT $512, RTX $172, NOC $526 — cohort sells off but defense budget trajectory intact.
LMTRTXAMZN: $11.6B Kuiper Capex Targets Starlink LEO
Amazon's $11.6B Kuiper investment highlights the LEO satellite spending boom, benefiting launchers like RKLB and builders like ASTS while pressuring VSAT. We rank six plays by exposure and valuation, favoring pure-plays amid $100B+ capex wave.
AMZNRKLBASTSNASA Artemis II Success: LMT Leads 6 Defense Stocks Ranked for Lunar Economy Upside
Artemis II's safe return on April 11, 2026, de-risks NASA's lunar program, favoring contractors like LMT and NOC with direct hardware roles. We rank six stocks by exposure, ranking LMT highest for its Orion primacy and steady growth. Risks include delays and competition from private launchers.
LMTBARTXIran Policy Rift Lifts LMT, NOC, XOM — 6 Defense & Energy Stocks to Buy Now
Policy rifts between Trump and Netanyahu over Iran elevate US defense spending and oil risks, benefiting LMT, NOC, RTX, GD, XOM, and CVX. Defense firms show record backlogs and production ramps; energy majors leverage low-cost assets amid supply threats. NOC and LMT top the conviction list.
LMTRTXGDInflation + Iran Risk: Why NOC and XOM Beat NVDA in a Higher-Rate Oil Spike
US labor stability and rising inflation pre-Iran conflict signal higher rates and oil spikes, favoring energy (XOM, CVX, OXY) and defense (RTX, NOC) over tech (NVDA). Top picks: NOC and XOM for balanced exposure and valuation.
XOMCVXOXYIsrael-Lebanon Strikes Push Oil to $110 — Is XLE or LMT the Better Bet Now?
Israeli strikes in Lebanon on April 9 threaten the Iran-US ceasefire, spiking oil to $110/bbl and lifting energy sentiment for XLE. Defense leaders LMT and NOC, with $75B/$42B revenues and record backlogs, are primed for missile demand amid Hezbollah risks—bullish on dips with 5-11% sales growth guided.
XLELMTLMT & NOC Surge on China-Iran Missile Warning — Is XLE the Casualty?
Trump's warning over China's alleged anti-air missiles to Iran heightens Middle East risks, positioning Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman for backlog growth amid record demand, while XLE grapples with oil volatility. LMT and NOC boast strong financials—$75B/$44B sales guidance, robust FCF—trading at reasonable multiples with 38-50% 1Y gains. Investors should favor defense over energy as U.S. aid ramps.
XLELMTBAIran Talks Collapse: Can XOM, CVX, LMT, NOC Hold Their 25%+ YTD Gains?
JD Vance's announcement of collapsed 21-hour US-Iran talks in Pakistan on April 12 threatens the ceasefire, revitalizing oil supply risks and defense demand. XOM and CVX stand strong with 26-28% YTD gains and robust margins, while LMT and NOC's massive backlogs position them for growth. Bullish outlook as escalation premiums lift valuations.
XOMCVXLMTLMT, NOC: Collapsed Iran Talks After 21 Hours Signal Defense Spending Surge
JD Vance's April 12 announcement of failed 21-hour US-Iran talks in Pakistan threatens the ceasefire and Iran's uranium stockpile security, priming LMT and NOC for missile defense windfalls atop record backlogs and upbeat guidance. Despite recent dips, strong financials and geopolitical tailwinds warrant bullish positioning ahead of potential escalations.
XLELMTBA's SLS Moon Rocket at Risk: 5 Space Stocks Poised to Win NASA's Next Contracts
Boeing's SLS faces Trump NASA scrutiny, per April 11 Bloomberg report, boosting Lockheed, Northrop, Rocket Lab, BWXT, and Intuitive Machines for lunar bases and nuclear propulsion. LMT and NOC top ranked for stability; BA lags. Article analyzes financials and exposure.
BALMTRTXIran Conflict: LMT & NOC Rally at Risk as Hormuz Reopening Lifts XOM
Trump's April 11 claim of U.S. victory over Iran and Hormuz reopening pressures LMT/NOC after strong YTD rallies while potentially easing XOM's supply strains. Defense stocks trade at premiums with robust FCF; energy leverages integration amid disruptions. Bullish defense long-term, monitor verification.
XOMLMTUSOHormuz Reopening: XOM & CVX Lock In 28% Gains as LMT, NOC Face Pivot
Trump's April 11 Truth Social claim of destroying Iran's military and imminent Hormuz reopening signals de-escalation, potentially stabilizing oil flows for XOM/CVX (28% YTD) amid production hits, while LMT/NOC (25-30% YTD) eye backlog endurance post-tensions.
XOMCVXLMTLMT, NOC Hold Firm as Trump's Hormuz Ultimatum Gives Europe Days to Act on Ukraine
NATO chief Rutte's April 9 warning of Trump's 'days-only' Hormuz pledge demand ties Ukraine arms to European commitments, buffering LMT/NOC's $289B backlogs while eyeing new contracts. Stocks hold firm with strong YTD gains and growth guidance, as XLE gains from energy security focus.
LMTXLEIsrael-Hezbollah Escalation: LMT and NOC Surge as XLE Eyes Oil Disruption Risk
Trump's tense call with Netanyahu on Lebanon escalates Israel-Hezbollah risks, boosting LMT and NOC on surging defense backlogs and production ramps while XLE eyes oil volatility. Financials show record strength for defense giants amid global tensions. Bullish on LMT/NOC; hold XLE pending supply disruptions.
XLELMTLebanon Conflict Stalls Iran Deal: LMT and NOC Keep Rallying — Is XLE Left Behind?
Ongoing Lebanon-Hezbollah conflict stalls Iran war resolution, extending tailwinds for LMT and NOC via record backlogs and sales growth while XLE grapples with oil volatility. Defense stocks trade at reasonable multiples with strong FCF and dividends, outperforming energy amid asymmetric risks. Overweight defense for escalation trades, monitor Hezbollah responses and oil breaches.
XLELMTCaspian Sea Strike Threatens XOM's $1.1B Kazakhstan Exports — USO and NOC in Focus
Ukraine's strike on Lukoil's Caspian Sea rigs spotlights risks to XOM's Kazakhstan exports via CPC pipeline, where $1.1B annual earnings are at stake. Oil ETFs like USO gain from supply fears, while NOC benefits from defense spending surges amid retaliation risks. XOM's fortress balance sheet weathers turbulence, but geopolitics favors pure-plays.
USOXOMUkraine Drone Demand Surge: Why AVAV, LMT, and RTX Are Watching Closely
Ukraine's recruitment of foreign drone pilots, featuring a Nigerian operator, signals intensifying UAV needs that could boost AeroVironment's Ukraine-heavy revenue and peers' backlogs. AVAV's Red Dragon and counter-UAS tech align perfectly, with strong FY26 guidance amid volatile shares. Broader defense giants like LMT, NOC, and RTX benefit from aid replenishment.
LMTAVAVRTXIran Strike Threat Boosts XOM, CVX and LMT — $194B Backlog Makes NOC a Must-Watch
President Trump's April 3 Truth Social threats of US strikes on Iranian bridges and power plants escalated tensions, lifting XOM, CVX, LMT, and NOC shares amid fears of oil supply disruptions and defense spending surges. Bolstered by stellar 2025 financials—XOM's $23.6B FCF, LMT's $194B backlog—and YTD gains over 25%, these stocks are primed for further upside. Bullish outlook with key catalysts in oil prices and contract awards.
XOMCVXLMTU.S. Missile Defense AI Spending: PLTR, LMT, RTX Lead $14B Race
PLTRLMTRTXAUKUS Defense Boom: Why LMT and RTX Win While Others Miss Out
As Australia prepares for a significant defense buildout in response to rising geopolitical tensions, US defense contractors are poised to benefit. Companies like Lockheed Martin and Raytheon Technologies are well-positioned to capture substantial contracts, while others like Northrop Grumman and General Dynamics also stand to gain from increased spending. This article explores the potential winners in this evolving landscape.
LMTRTXGD
Northrop Grumman Corporation company profile
Overview
Northrop Grumman Corporation (NYSE:NOC) is a major American aerospace and defense contractor founded in 1939 and headquartered in Falls Church, Virginia. The company has evolved through numerous mergers and acquisitions over the decades to become one of the largest defense contractors globally. Originally established as Northrop Aircraft, the company merged with Grumman Corporation in 1994 to form Northrop Grumman. Today, the company operates as a prime contractor and systems integrator for the U.S. Department of Defense, NASA, international governments, and commercial customers, specializing in advanced technology solutions across air, land, sea, space, and cyberspace domains.
Business
Northrop Grumman operates in the aerospace and defense industry, providing advanced technology systems and solutions primarily for national security applications. The company's business is organized into four main segments that collectively generated $41 billion in revenue in 2024: Aeronautics Systems (approximately 29% of revenue) designs, develops, manufactures, and sustains military aircraft systems. This segment's flagship programs include the B-21 Raider stealth bomber, which represents the next generation of strategic long-range strike aircraft for the U.S. Air Force. The B-21 is designed to penetrate advanced enemy air defenses and deliver both conventional and nuclear payloads. The segment also produces the F-35 Lightning II center fuselage sections, Global Hawk and Triton unmanned surveillance aircraft that provide high-altitude, long-endurance intelligence gathering capabilities, and the E-2D Advanced Hawkeye airborne early warning aircraft. Defense Systems (approximately 25% of revenue) focuses on weapons and mission systems, including integrated battle management systems, precision strike weapons, and propulsion systems. Key products include the Integrated Battle Command System (IBCS), which serves as the "brain" for Army air and missile defense by connecting various sensors and interceptors into a unified network. The segment also produces Guided Multiple Launch Rocket Systems (GMLRS), various missile systems, gun systems, and ammunition. This division has seen increased demand due to global conflicts and the need for advanced weaponry. Mission Systems (approximately 32% of revenue) provides command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (C4ISR) systems. This includes radar systems, electronic warfare capabilities, cyber solutions, advanced microelectronics, and maritime systems. The segment produces sophisticated sensors and communication systems that enable military forces to detect, track, and engage threats while maintaining secure communications. Space Systems (approximately 14% of revenue) develops satellites, ground systems, missile defense interceptors, launch vehicles, and strategic missiles. Notable programs include the Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) system, which will replace the aging Minuteman III missiles, and various satellite programs for national security and NASA missions. The segment also produces solid rocket motors that power various missile and space launch systems.
Revenue model
Northrop Grumman generates revenue primarily through government contracts, with approximately 86% of sales coming from U.S. government customers and 14% from international customers. The company operates under several contract types: Cost-plus contracts reimburse the company for allowable costs plus a predetermined fee, typically used for development programs where technical risks are high. These contracts provide stable margins but limit upside potential. Fixed-price contracts require the company to deliver products or services for a predetermined price, offering higher profit potential but also bearing cost overrun risks. The company has been gradually transitioning toward more fixed-price arrangements as programs mature from development to production phases. The company's customers include the U.S. Department of Defense (Army, Navy, Air Force, Space Force), NASA, international governments and their defense agencies, and select commercial customers. Major programs often span decades, providing long-term revenue visibility through multi-year contracts and follow-on production orders. Several factors influence Northrop Grumman's profitability margins. Positive margin drivers include economies of scale as programs transition from low-rate to full-rate production, learning curve efficiencies in manufacturing, successful cost reduction initiatives, and favorable contract negotiations. The company's focus on high-technology, differentiated products also commands premium pricing. Negative margin pressures come from inflation in labor and material costs, supply chain disruptions that can delay deliveries and increase costs, intense competition for new contract awards, and the inherent risks in fixed-price development contracts where technical challenges can lead to cost overruns. Additionally, the transition from development to production phases can temporarily compress margins as manufacturing processes are optimized. The company's international expansion efforts, representing 14% of total sales with strong growth prospects, offer opportunities for margin improvement as international customers often accept different pricing structures and the business faces less intense competition compared to domestic markets.
Competitive moat
Northrop Grumman possesses a strong competitive moat built on several key factors that create significant barriers to entry and sustainable competitive advantages. The company's primary moat stems from its specialized technical expertise in highly complex, mission-critical systems that require decades of accumulated knowledge and experience. Programs like the B-21 stealth bomber and Sentinel ICBM system demand advanced engineering capabilities in stealth technology, nuclear systems, and precision manufacturing that few companies globally can match. The company benefits from extremely high switching costs for customers, as defense programs typically span 20-30 years from development through production and sustainment. Once a contractor is selected for a major program, the government faces enormous costs and risks in switching to alternative suppliers, creating long-term revenue streams. Additionally, Northrop Grumman holds security clearances and classified technology access that represent significant barriers to entry for potential competitors, particularly for strategic nuclear deterrent programs where only a handful of companies are qualified to participate. The company's scale advantages in specialized areas like solid rocket motor production, advanced microelectronics, and stealth technology create cost advantages that smaller competitors cannot easily replicate. Northrop Grumman has also built strong relationships with government customers through decades of successful program execution, creating institutional trust that influences contract award decisions. However, the moat faces some challenges. The defense industry experiences intense competition from other major contractors like Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and Boeing, particularly for new program competitions. The company also faces potential disruption from emerging defense technology companies and commercial firms bringing innovative approaches to traditional defense problems. Additionally, budget constraints and political pressures for competitive sourcing can erode some of the traditional advantages of incumbent contractors. Despite these challenges, Northrop Grumman's moat remains relatively strong due to the specialized nature of its core competencies and the critical importance of its products to national security.
Risks & safety
Northrop Grumman presents a moderate margin of safety with generally solid financial fundamentals but some areas of concern: • Liquidity and Solvency: The company maintains adequate liquidity with $4.4 billion in cash and short-term investments as of Q4 2024. However, the current ratio of 1.01 indicates tight working capital management. Operating cash flow was strong at $4.4 billion for 2024, though Q1 2025 showed negative $1.6 billion due to timing of contract payments. The debt-to-equity ratio of 1.08 represents moderate leverage levels typical for the industry. • Valuation Metrics: Trading at 16.5x trailing earnings and 11.6x EV/EBITDA for 2024, the stock appears reasonably valued relative to earnings. However, the forward P/E of 38.5x for Q1 2025 reflects recent B-21 program charges that temporarily depressed earnings. The price-to-book ratio of 4.5x suggests the market values the company's intangible assets and contract backlog. • Other Considerations: The record backlog of $92.8 billion provides substantial revenue visibility, representing over two years of sales. Free cash flow generation has been strong historically but can be volatile due to contract timing. The company's dependence on government spending creates some cyclical risk, though defense budgets have remained robust.
Recent development
Over the past few years, Northrop Grumman has executed several strategic initiatives to position itself for long-term growth and operational excellence. The company has made significant investments in production capacity, particularly tripling its solid rocket motor manufacturing capabilities to meet growing demand for missile and space launch systems. This expansion addresses supply chain constraints that have limited growth in recent years. The company has accelerated its international expansion, achieving a 1.4x book-to-bill ratio in international markets during 2024 and expecting double-digit international growth in 2025. Key international opportunities include the Integrated Battle Command System (IBCS), Triton unmanned aircraft systems, E-2D Advanced Hawkeye aircraft, and various missile defense systems, particularly in European and Asia-Pacific markets responding to evolving security threats. Digital transformation and advanced manufacturing have been central to the company's operational excellence initiatives. Northrop Grumman has invested heavily in digital engineering tools, automation, and advanced manufacturing techniques to improve efficiency and reduce costs. The microelectronics business has emerged as a particular growth driver, expanding over 20% in 2024 as demand increases for advanced semiconductors in defense applications. The company has also made strategic portfolio decisions, including the exit from its training services business to focus resources on higher-margin, technology-differentiated offerings. Additionally, Northrop Grumman has continued investing in next-generation technologies including autonomous systems, hypersonic weapons, and space-based capabilities, positioning itself for emerging defense requirements. Recent program developments include the progression of the B-21 Raider into low-rate initial production, successful testing milestones for the Sentinel ICBM program, and expansion of the IBCS program with new contracts and international interest. These developments reflect the company's successful execution of major development programs transitioning toward production phases.
NOC company profile · for informational purposes only — not investment advice.
Track NOC with Drillr
SEC filings, earnings calls, insider activity, alt-data signals — all queryable through Drillr's AI terminal and MCP API.
Try Drillr for free