Skip to content
Company Deep DiveKO

[KO] Coca-Cola: Q3 2026 Earnings Test Whether Volume-Led Growth Holds

Editorial illustration for [KO] Coca-Cola: Q3 2026 Earnings Test Whether Volume-Led Growth Holds
Published 34 min read

Summary

Coca-Cola grew organic revenue 6% in Q2 2026 on 5% unit case volume and raised full-year guidance; Q3 results will show whether volume-led growth survives tougher comparisons after the World Cup.

The Coca-Cola Company owns the brands and formulas, sells concentrates and syrups to independent bottlers around the world, and relies on those bottlers to package and distribute the drinks to retailers and restaurants[1]. The earnings calendar lists the company's next earnings call for 2026-10-20, when Coca-Cola Q3 2026 earnings will cover the third quarter of 2026[2]. The latest disclosed period is the second quarter ended July 3, 2026: net operating revenues were $13.38 billion, up 7%, and organic revenues grew 6%, made up of 4% growth in concentrate sales and 2% from price/mix[3]; global unit case volume grew 5%[4], operating income was $4,672 million, up 9%[5], and comparable EPS was $0.97, up 11%[3]. On the same day the company raised its full-year 2026 organic revenue growth guidance from 4% to 5% to approximately 5%, raised its full-year comparable EPS growth guidance from 8% to 9% to 9% to 10%, and flagged an approximately 1% currency tailwind and an approximately 1% divestiture headwind to third-quarter comparable net revenues; the company guides only for the full year and did not give a third-quarter revenue or EPS figure[6]. 24/7 Wall St. reported on September 1, 2026 that the analyst consensus for the quarter was EPS of $0.8789 on revenue of $12.9 billion, and that article does not name its data provider or the number of analysts[7].

Three things are worth watching in the coming third-quarter report. The first is volume: second-quarter growth was led by volume, but the quarter had help from World Cup marketing[8], management put the two-year compound volume growth rate at only 2%[9], and it cautioned that the second half faces higher comparisons and six fewer calendar days[10], so whether third-quarter unit case volume holds above 3% decides whether the second quarter was a new normal or a one-time lift. The second is the quality of profit: second-quarter advertising expenses were $1,565 million, up about 18%[11], and roughly 5 points of the 9% growth in reported operating income came from currency[5], so third-quarter advertising and gross margin will show how much profit growth remains once currency and spending timing are removed. The third is one open question in each of two segments: Asia Pacific volume grew 8% while price/mix fell 9% and comparable currency neutral operating income was flat[12]; in North America, fairlife's U.S. plants suspended all production on July 16 because of a ransomware event[13], and the company said in its 10-Q that the incident is not reasonably likely to have a material impact[14], which makes the third-quarter report the first chance to test both matters against segment numbers.

Company Background and Business Structure

Coca-Cola is a beverage company that does not bottle most of its own products. Founded in 1886 and based in Atlanta, it owns the brands and formulas and makes concentrates and syrups that it sells to independent bottling partners; the bottlers add water and sweeteners, package and distribute the drinks, and sell them to retail and food-service customers[1]. The Coca-Cola system sold 33.8 billion unit cases in 2025, of which 69% were sparkling soft drinks and 47% were Trademark Coca-Cola; the United States accounted for 16% of worldwide unit case volume, and the four largest countries outside the United States, Mexico, China, Brazil and India, together accounted for 33%[15].

Revenue comes from two lines of business that differ sharply in size and margin. Concentrate operations contributed 59% of net operating revenues and 85% of unit case volume in 2025; finished product operations, mainly the consolidated bottling plants, fairlife dairy in North America, Costa stores and fountain syrups in the United States, contributed 41% of revenue and 15% of volume[16], and the 10-K states that finished product operations generate higher revenues but lower gross margins than concentrate operations[1]. By operating segment, North America was 40.8% of 2025 net operating revenues, Europe, Middle East and Africa 22.6%, Latin America 13.2%, Asia Pacific 11.1% and Bottling Investments 12.0%[17].

Bottling Investments holds bottling plants that the company owns temporarily and plans to transfer to partners, and its moves change consolidated revenue and margins. The company had already refranchised bottling operations in the Philippines, Bangladesh and certain territories in India[18], and in October 2025 it agreed to sell a majority of its interest in its Africa bottling operations to Coca-Cola HBC, an equity method investee; closing is subject to regulatory approvals and is expected by the end of 2026, when the operations will be deconsolidated, and Coca-Cola HBC holds a separate option to acquire the company's remaining 25% interest within six years of closing[19]. Customer concentration also comes from the bottling system: the five largest independent bottling partners together represented 44% of worldwide unit case volume in 2025[20], and one bottler accounted for 10% of the company's net operating revenues[21]. On the management side, Henrique Braun is chief executive officer[22], and President and Chief Financial Officer John Murphy has overseen North America on an interim basis since August 1, 2026[23].

Financial History and Current Position

Revenue grew slowly over the past three years, and the swings in profit came mainly from one-time items. Net operating revenues were $47,941 million in 2025, $47,061 million in 2024 and $45,754 million in 2023; operating income was $13,762 million in 2025, above $9,992 million in 2024[24], and operating margin rose from 21.2% to 28.7%[25], with the low 2024 base mainly reflecting a $3,109 million charge to remeasure the contingent consideration tied to the fairlife acquisition[26]. Gross margin was 61.6% in 2025 against 61.1% in 2024[18]; net income attributable to shareowners was $13,107 million[24], which included both a $1,952 million gain on the sale of the stake in Coca-Cola Consolidated and a $1,274 million charge on the Africa bottling operations that became held for sale[27].

Cash flow in 2025 was held down by a final acquisition payment, while the dividend kept growing. Net cash from operating activities was $7,408 million, against $6,805 million in 2024[28], in a year when the company made the final $6,173 million milestone payment for fairlife[29], and dividends paid were $8,779 million, up from $8,359 million in 2024[30].

In 2026, revenue, margins and earnings per share all improved in the second quarter ended July 3. Net operating revenues were $13,380 million against $12,535 million a year earlier[31], up 7%, with organic revenues up 6%[3]; gross margin was 62.9% against 62.4%[32]; operating income was $4,672 million, up 9%[5], operating margin was 34.9% against 34.1%, comparable operating margin was 35.6%, EPS was $1.03, and comparable EPS was $0.97, up 11%[3].

First-half cash flow has returned to a normal level, and leverage sits below the company's own target. First-half net operating revenues were $25,852 million and operating income was $9,031 million[31]; net cash from operating activities was $7,543 million, against a net outflow of $1,391 million a year earlier[33], and the gap mainly reflects the $6,069 million of fairlife payments made in the prior-year period[29]. On the earnings call management cited free cash flow of $6.9 billion and net debt leverage of 1.4 times EBITDA, below its target range of 2 to 2.5 times[9]; the company's full-year 2026 guidance calls for approximately $14.6 billion of cash from operations, approximately $2.2 billion of capital expenditures and approximately $12.4 billion of free cash flow, up from earlier free cash flow guidance of approximately $12.2 billion[6].

Operating Model

Coca-Cola's revenue equals the quantity of concentrates and finished products sold multiplied by price/mix, plus or minus currency and the effect of acquisitions and divestitures. Concentrate operations are 59% of revenue and sell to bottlers; finished product operations are 41% and sell directly to retailers and distributors[16]. Consumer unit case volume sets long-run demand, but the company recognizes revenue when concentrate ships, so quarterly organic revenue growth approximately equals concentrate sales growth plus price/mix: in the second quarter of 2026 that was 4% plus 2% for 6%, while unit case volume grew 5% and shipments ran 1 point behind volume[3]. Management said concentrate shipments should slightly lag unit case volume for full-year 2026[34], so shipments and consumer volume often differ by a few points in a single quarter, and that gap has to be read separately when judging quarterly revenue.

On the profit side the key lines are gross margin and marketing expense: the first is set by pricing, business mix and input costs, and the second can move between quarters. Concentrates carry a higher gross margin than finished products[1], so refranchising bottling plants lifts the consolidated margin, and part of the 2025 gross margin gain came from earlier refranchising[18]; what presses on gross margin is the cost of sweeteners, juice, dairy and packaging, and the 10-K notes that high fructose corn syrup, the principal nutritive sweetener in the United States, has historically been subject to price fluctuations[35]. The largest variable item after gross profit is marketing, with second-quarter advertising expenses of $1,565 million against $1,328 million a year earlier[11]. Comparable currency neutral operating income grew 6% in the second quarter of 2026[3], while reported operating income grew 9%, and the difference came from currency and items impacting comparability[5].

The concentrate business needs little capital, so most profit converts to cash, and that cash goes mainly to dividends, capital expenditures and one-time items. Dividends paid were $8,779 million in 2025[30], 2026 guidance calls for approximately $2.2 billion of capital expenditures, approximately $14.6 billion of cash from operations and approximately $12.4 billion of free cash flow[6], and the first half has already delivered $7,543 million of operating cash flow[33] and $6.9 billion of free cash flow[9]. The company also has a $6.0 billion tax deposit with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, which would be refunded in full or in part, with interest, if its tax positions are sustained on appeal[36].

This model can be tested each quarter at the consolidated level and in two segments, North America and Asia Pacific, while visibility elsewhere is limited. North America and Asia Pacific both disclose volume, price/mix and segment profit, and each has one unresolved operating question; changes in Europe, Middle East and Africa and in Latin America show up mainly through marketing timing and currency, and in the second quarter comparable currency neutral operating income in Europe, Middle East and Africa fell 5% because of higher marketing investments and operating expenses[37]. The company does not disclose revenue by brand or country and does not break price/mix into its parts, so pricing cannot be separated from mix; fairlife has no separate financial data, so the effect of the production halt can only be inferred from the North America segment and the related beverage category.

Industry and Competitive Position

Commercial beverages are an industry with many competitors, and Coca-Cola holds its position through its brand portfolio and the distribution depth of its bottling system. The 10-K describes the industry as highly competitive, with rivals ranging from small emerging brands to large global companies and categories spanning sparkling soft drinks, water, juice, coffee, tea, energy drinks, sports drinks, dairy and plant-based beverages[38]. Distribution depth comes from the bottling system: the five largest independent bottling partners, Coca-Cola FEMSA, CCEP, Coca-Cola HBC, Arca Continental and Swire Coca-Cola, together represent 44% of worldwide unit case volume[20], which is an advantage but also means that bottlers, as independent companies, make business decisions that may not always align with Coca-Cola's interests[21].

On market share the company stayed ahead in most regions in the second quarter, but the available comparison stops at the company's own statements. In the second quarter of 2026 the company gained value share in total nonalcoholic ready-to-drink beverages, with gains in Europe, Middle East and Africa, Latin America and North America[3], and only Asia Pacific lost share overall because of a loss in India[12]. These disclosures do not include share or financial figures for any specific competitor, so Coca-Cola's advantage over an individual rival cannot be quantified here; management also noted cautious consumer sentiment in China and mixed conditions across Latin American markets[39], so demand and competitive pressure differ from region to region.

Core Debates

Can Coca-Cola's growth stay volume-led once the World Cup quarter is behind it?

Whether growth is led by volume or by price determines how long revenue growth can last. In 2025 Coca-Cola's revenue growth came almost entirely from price/mix: volume contributed 1 point for the year and price/mix contributed 4 points[40]. In the second quarter of 2026 the balance reversed, with unit case volume up 5%[4] and price/mix contributing only 2%[3]. Volume-led growth does not depend on consumers continuing to accept price increases, and the transmission is direct: unit case volume determines how much concentrate bottlers order, concentrate sales growth plus price/mix equals organic revenue growth, and adding currency and divestiture effects gives reported net operating revenues; if volume slows while price/mix is unchanged, organic revenue growth slows with it.

The current evidence supports a volume recovery, but it cannot yet rule out a one-time effect. Organic revenues grew 6% in the second quarter[3], volume was led by India, China, the United States and Brazil, Trademark Coca-Cola grew 5% and Coca-Cola Zero Sugar grew 16%[4], management described organic revenue growth as at the high end of the company's long-term growth algorithm[41], and the company raised its full-year organic revenue guidance to approximately 5%[6]. A different reading is equally plausible: the company itself said its World Cup campaign contributed to a portion of the 5% volume growth for Trademark Coca-Cola and the 8% volume growth for Powerade, without quantifying that portion[8]; management put two-year compound volume growth at only 2%[9], cautioned that the second half faces higher comparisons[10], and the fourth quarter will have six fewer days than a year earlier[42], while it also described cautious consumer sentiment in China and inflation-driven pressure on many consumers[39]. If third-quarter volume growth returns to around 2%, the second quarter will look more like a one-time lift from an easy comparison combined with the tournament.

The third-quarter report should be read for the separate contributions of volume and price/mix and for the direction of the shipment gap. The points to watch are whether organic revenue growth lands between 4% and 6%, whether unit case volume growth holds above 3% and still comes from several regions, which way the gap between concentrate shipments and unit case volume moves, and whether management maintains full-year organic revenue guidance of approximately 5%. Two observations would overturn the volume-led reading: unit case volume growth falling to 2% or below, which would indicate the second quarter mainly reflected the easy comparison and the tournament; or price/mix falling to zero or turning negative, which would indicate volume was bought with price concessions.

Asia Pacific volume grew 8% but profit was flat: when does the affordability push pay back?

Asia Pacific is only about 11% of company revenue[17], yet it is the fastest-growing region by volume, and that growth currently earns little. India and China both led global volume growth in the second quarter[4], and management treats Asia Pacific as a source of long-term growth, deliberately using affordable packages and cold-drink equipment to widen its lower-income consumer base[43]. The transmission works like this: affordable small packages and faster growth in emerging markets lift volume but also push price/mix down; concentrate sales growth plus price/mix gives segment organic revenue, and subtracting marketing investment and input costs gives segment operating income. Profit grows only when volume growth exceeds the decline in price/mix and the increase in marketing, and the timing of that crossover determines how much the company's global volume growth is worth.

The second-quarter numbers show strong volume alongside weak pricing, profit and share. Asia Pacific unit case volume grew 8%, price/mix declined 9%, organic revenues grew only 2%, concentrate shipments ran 3 points ahead of volume, comparable currency neutral operating income was even, and the company lost value share in the region as gains in Japan and China were more than offset by a loss in India[12]. Segment operating income was $656 million against $647 million a year earlier[44], operating margin was 44.1% against 44.2%, and for the first half it fell from 45.6% to 40.9%[45]; first-half organic revenues grew only 3% and comparable currency neutral operating income fell 8%[46]. Management's explanation is deliberate investment: it said the price/mix decline splits evenly among investment timing, affordability initiatives and geographic mix, and compared the phase to the earlier development of its Latin American business[43]. The other explanation is that competition in India is forcing price concessions, in which case both volume and share would weaken; for now volume is strong and share is weak, so neither explanation has been ruled out.

What the third-quarter report can answer is whether profit has started to follow volume. The points to watch are whether Asia Pacific operating income grows year over year and whether the comparable currency neutral measure turns positive with it, whether the price/mix decline narrows from 9% and whether the company still cites affordability initiatives, whether the 3 points of concentrate shipments that ran ahead in the second quarter reverse in the third, and how the company describes value share in India. The investment-phase reading would be overturned if volume growth slows to low single digits while price/mix stays at a high-single-digit decline, which would indicate that lower prices did not buy incremental demand; or if segment operating income is again flat or down while value share keeps falling because of India.

Margins widened while advertising rose 18%: what holds once timing and currency fade?

Coca-Cola raised its full-year EPS guidance while spending more on advertising, and the question is how much of second-quarter profit growth came from operations themselves. Comparable operating margin expanded by about 0.9 percentage points in the second quarter[9], but three items in that quarter's income statement will change: the timing of advertising spending, the currency tailwind, and the Africa bottling operations that have not yet closed. The transmission works like this: pricing and currency lift gross margin, the costs of sweeteners, juice, dairy and packaging reduce it, and gross profit less marketing and administrative expenses gives operating income. Marketing can move between quarters, so a single quarter's operating margin reflects both real cost efficiency and spending timing; once the Africa bottling operations are deconsolidated[19], low-margin finished product revenue will shrink and the consolidated margin will be lifted again for structural reasons.

The second-quarter data support both an optimistic and a cautious reading. Gross margin was 62.9% against 62.4% a year earlier, and the 10-Q attributes the increase to pricing initiatives, currency and the sale of finished product operations in Nigeria, partially offset by higher commodity costs[32]; advertising expenses were $1,565 million, up about 18%[11]; operating income was $4,672 million, up 9%, of which currency contributed about 5 points, and the 10-Q says the increase in marketing spending was partly due to timing[5], while comparable currency neutral operating income grew 6%[3]. The optimistic reading is that underlying profit still grew 6% despite heavier marketing, which leaves more profit leverage once timing swings back. The cautious reading is that lower operating expenses included items that may not repeat, such as lower annual incentive expense[47], that management said on the first-quarter call that bottling partners have more exposure to aluminum and PET costs[48], that the second-quarter call still listed commodity price volatility as an uncertainty even as management called the overall effect on its cost basket manageable[49], and that marketing expenses may not decline after the World Cup.

Third-quarter advertising expenses and gross margin can separate these two readings. The points to watch are whether comparable currency neutral operating income grows at least 6% and how much of the gap to the reported figure comes from currency, whether advertising growth slows from about 18% and gross margin holds the year-earlier level, and whether the Africa bottling sale closes at the end of the third quarter and the company changes its full-year 2% to 3% divestiture headwind or its EPS guidance[6]. The view that margin expansion is sustainable would be overturned if gross margin falls year over year and the company attributes the decline to commodity costs; or if advertising keeps growing at a double-digit rate while comparable currency neutral operating income growth drops below 4%.

fairlife plants were halted by ransomware and the company calls it immaterial: what will Q3 show?

North America contributes about two-fifths of company revenue[17] and is the segment where pricing contributes most, and its fastest-growing finished product business stopped production right at the start of the third quarter. fairlife is a dairy brand the company acquired in 2020; the final $6,173 million payment for it was completed in 2025[29], and its volume has grown 18% year to date[50]. On July 16, 2026, its U.S. plants suspended all production because of a ransomware event[13]; at about the same time Jennifer Mann, the head of North America, left the role, and Chief Financial Officer John Murphy took interim responsibility from August 1[23]. The transmission works like this: fairlife is a finished product that the company makes and sells directly, demand exceeds capacity, a plant halt directly reduces the quantity available for sale and therefore North America volume and revenue, fixed costs continue and reduce segment operating income, and the pace of restart and of the new plant's ramp determines whether the gap can be made up within the quarter.

North America was in good shape before the halt, and the company characterizes the incident as immaterial, but outsiders still lack numbers to check that against. In the second quarter North America unit case volume grew 3%, price/mix grew 4%, organic revenues grew 7%, comparable currency neutral operating income grew 12%, and the company gained value share in Trademark Coca-Cola and in juice, value-added dairy and plant-based beverages[51]; segment operating income was $1,695 million against $1,621 million a year earlier[52], and operating margin was 31.4%, below 32.3% a year earlier[45]. The July 16 8-K disclosed that fairlife's U.S. production was suspended and that Canada was not affected[13]; the July 29 10-Q said a majority of production had resumed and that the incident has not had, and is not reasonably likely to have, a material impact[14]; management added on the call that consumer availability had not been disrupted and that the new Webster facility was ramping on schedule[50]. In support of the company's position, fairlife is a limited part of a company with annual revenue of nearly $48 billion[24]; against it, fairlife was already supply-constrained, lost output is hard to recover with later production, and the company has not yet disclosed the number of days lost, the amount of any loss or any follow-on cost from the data taken.

The third-quarter report is the first chance to test the word immaterial against numbers. The points to watch are whether North America operating income grows year over year and whether operating margin stays below the year-earlier level, whether juice, value-added dairy and plant-based beverages are still named as a source of North America volume growth, and whether the company discloses a full restart at fairlife, the amount lost to the halt and the appointment of a new North America head. The company's position would be overturned if the third-quarter report discloses a quantifiable loss or expense tied to the ransomware event; or if North America volume turns flat or negative and segment operating income declines.

Risks and Falsifiers

The transfer pricing litigation with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service is the largest single risk by amount, and it affects cash and taxes rather than quarterly operations. The company has deposited $6.0 billion for the 2007 through 2009 tax years[36], and as of July 3, 2026 it also carried $514 million of related accrued interest receivable; if it loses, those amounts would not be refunded, and the company says it would likely be subject to significant additional liabilities for subsequent years[53]. The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in June 2026, and management said a decision is expected in 6 to 12 months[54]. The observation that would remove this risk is a ruling in the company's favor followed by recovery of the deposit, or a disclosed settlement.

Revenue concentrated in a few independent bottling partners is a structural risk to concentrate sales and pricing power. The five largest bottling partners represent 44% of worldwide unit case volume[20], and one bottler accounts for 10% of the company's net operating revenues[21]; bottlers bear packaging costs such as aluminum and PET[48], and when their interests diverge from the company's they may cut investment behind its brands or resist concentrate price increases. The concern does not hold if the main bottling partners keep following the company's marketing and pricing cadence and concentrate sales growth stays in line with unit case volume growth over time.

Second-quarter volume growth may have come mainly from World Cup marketing and an easy comparison, with growth slowing once the third quarter faces a higher base, and the exposed line is organic revenue. Each 1 percentage point less of organic revenue growth equals about $130 million of quarterly revenue at the second-quarter revenue level and would unsettle full-year organic revenue guidance of approximately 5%[6], and management has already cautioned that second-half comparisons are higher[10]. The risk is falsified if third-quarter unit case volume growth is at least 3% and organic revenue growth is at least 4%.

The affordability push in Asia Pacific may keep diluting margins, so that volume growth does not turn into segment profit while value share in India keeps slipping[12]. Asia Pacific operating income was $656 million in the second quarter[44], about 14% of consolidated operating income, and first-half comparable currency neutral operating income has already fallen 8%[46]. The falsifying condition is year-over-year growth in third-quarter Asia Pacific operating income together with a price/mix decline narrower than 9%.

Second-quarter margin expansion may have come partly from currency and expense timing, and the risk is that commodity costs rise while marketing does not come down after the World Cup, which exposes gross margin and operating income. Advertising expenses were about $237 million higher than a year earlier in the second quarter[11], equal to about 5% of the quarter's operating income, and currency added about 5 points to reported operating income growth[5]; the decline in corporate expense came mainly from lower annual incentive expense and lower other operating charges[47], and management lists commodity price volatility as an ongoing uncertainty[49]. The risk is falsified if third-quarter comparable currency neutral operating income grows at least 6% and gross margin is no lower than a year earlier[32].

The volume gap and recovery costs from the fairlife halt may turn out larger than the company's immaterial characterization, and the data taken in the incident may bring follow-on costs[14]. The exposed line is the North America segment, which earned $1,695 million of operating income in the second quarter[52], 36% of consolidated operating income, while fairlife has no separately disclosed financial data, so any gap can only be observed indirectly through segment figures. The company's position is supported if third-quarter North America volume and segment operating income grow year over year, the company confirms a full restart and it discloses no material loss.

What to Watch Next

  • Volume-led growth. The second-quarter 2026 starting point is organic revenues up 6%, unit case volume up 5% and price/mix up 2%[3]. Watch whether third-quarter organic revenue growth lands between 4% and 6%, whether volume holds above 3% and whether full-year guidance of approximately 5% is maintained. Volume at 2% or below, or price/mix at zero or negative, would falsify the volume-led reading.
  • Asia Pacific payback. The second-quarter starting point is operating income of $656 million, volume up 8%, price/mix down 9% and operating margin of 44.1%[45]. Watch whether segment profit grows year over year, whether the price/mix decline narrows and whether the 3 points of shipments that ran ahead reverse. Low-single-digit volume with a high-single-digit price/mix decline, or profit that is again flat or down while share keeps slipping, would falsify the investment-phase reading.
  • Advertising and margins. The second-quarter starting point is comparable currency neutral operating income up 6%, advertising expenses of $1,565 million, gross margin of 62.9% and operating margin of 34.9%[32]. Watch whether underlying profit growth stays at 6% or better, whether advertising growth slows from about 18%, whether gross margin holds the year-earlier level and whether the Africa bottling sale closes. A year-over-year decline in gross margin blamed on commodity costs, or double-digit advertising growth with underlying profit growth below 4%, would show the expansion is not sustainable.
  • fairlife and North America. The second-quarter starting point is operating income of $1,695 million, volume up 3% and price/mix up 4%, with a majority of fairlife production resumed as of July 29[14]. Watch whether North America profit and volume grow year over year and whether the company confirms a full restart and names a new segment head. A disclosed quantifiable loss or expense, or flat-to-lower volume with lower profit, would falsify the immaterial characterization.
  • Tax litigation. The starting point is a $6.0 billion deposit and $514 million of accrued interest, with oral arguments completed in June 2026[54]. Watch the timing and outcome of the Eleventh Circuit ruling and any disclosed settlement. A win with recovery of the deposit removes the risk; a loss means the deposit is not refunded and later years may carry additional tax.

Conclusion

Coca-Cola's business is driven jointly by consumer volume, price/mix and the pacing of marketing spending, and revenue, margins and cash flow are all improving at the moment. In the second quarter of 2026 organic revenues grew 6% and unit case volume grew 5%[4], operating margin was 34.9%[3], first-half operating cash flow was $7,543 million[33], net debt leverage was 1.4 times EBITDA[9], and the company raised its full-year guidance for organic revenue, EPS and free cash flow[6]. The central unresolved relationship is how much of this round of growth and margin expansion came from repeatable operating improvement and how much came from the World Cup, an easy comparison, the currency tailwind and expense timing; the split between volume and profit in Asia Pacific and the fairlife production halt are how that question shows up in two segments.

Most independent commentary published after the second-quarter report focused on the share price and trading multiples, and only one piece addressed the operating questions, so there is no outside consensus to speak of here and the piece should be read as one outside interpretation. Rajani Lohia of Zacks Investment Research argued on August 5, 2026 that the raised guidance is supported by volume, margins and currency, but that the timing of the Africa bottling sale, six fewer operating days in the fourth quarter and an uneven consumer environment may make reported growth less representative of underlying demand and complicate the comparison between operating momentum and headline results[55]. That view points in the same direction as the first and third debates, placing the question on whether second-half growth and profit can continue and on how divestitures and day-count differences distort the readings; it does not address Asia Pacific profit or the fairlife halt, where the company's own disclosures are currently the only basis.

The combination that would materially strengthen the current understanding is third-quarter unit case volume growth holding above 3% with organic revenue growth of at least 4%, comparable currency neutral operating income growth of at least 6% with gross margin no lower than a year earlier, Asia Pacific segment profit turning positive year over year with a narrower price/mix decline, and North America volume and profit growing year over year with the company confirming a full restart at fairlife. Conversely, if volume falls to 2% or below, if advertising keeps growing at a double-digit rate while underlying profit growth drops below 4%, if Asia Pacific profit is again flat or down, or if the company discloses a quantifiable loss tied to the ransomware event, the second quarter would be better understood as a high point built on stacked one-time factors, and the raised full-year guidance would become harder to deliver.

Sources

[1] KO 10-K filed 2026-02-20 · 2026-02-20 · 10-K · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026010047/ko-20251231.htm

[2] KO earnings calendar · 2026-10-20 earnings call (calendar last updated 2026-09-19) · 2026-09-19 · earnings calendar

[3] KO 8-K filed 2026-07-28 · Q2 highlights · 2026-07-28 · 8-K · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026049922/a2026q2earningsreleaseex-9.htm

[4] KO 8-K filed 2026-07-28 · consolidated volume and price/mix · 2026-07-28 · 8-K · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026049922/a2026q2earningsreleaseex-9.htm

[5] KO 10-Q filed 2026-07-29 · consolidated operating income drivers · 2026-07-29 · 10-Q · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026050503/ko-20260703.htm

[6] KO 8-K filed 2026-07-28 · full year 2026 guidance · 2026-07-28 · 8-K · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026049922/a2026q2earningsreleaseex-9.htm

[7] 24/7 Wall St. 2026-09-01 · Q3 2026 analyst consensus · 2026-09-01 · 24/7 Wall St.(转述分析师一致预期) · https://247wallst.com/investing/2026/09/01/coca-cola-stock-is-up-26-in-2026-what-will-it-take-to-break-through-100/

[8] KO 8-K filed 2026-07-28 · World Cup activation · 2026-07-28 · 8-K · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026049922/a2026q2earningsreleaseex-9.htm

[9] KO earnings call 2026-07-28 · quarter financial summary · 2026-07-28 · earnings-call · https://investors.coca-colacompany.com/

[10] KO earnings call 2026-07-28 · second-half outlook · 2026-07-28 · earnings-call · https://investors.coca-colacompany.com/

[11] KO 10-Q filed 2026-07-29 · advertising expenses · 2026-07-29 · 10-Q · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026050503/ko-20260703.htm

[12] KO 8-K filed 2026-07-28 · Asia Pacific review · 2026-07-28 · 8-K · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026049922/a2026q2earningsreleaseex-9.htm

[13] KO 8-K filed 2026-07-16 · fairlife ransomware event · 2026-07-16 · 8-K · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026048466/ko-20260716.htm

[14] KO 10-Q filed 2026-07-29 · fairlife ransomware event · 2026-07-29 · 10-Q · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026050503/ko-20260703.htm

[15] KO 10-K filed 2026-02-20 · unit case volume mix · 2026-02-20 · 10-K · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026010047/ko-20251231.htm

[16] KO 10-K filed 2026-02-20 · concentrate versus finished product mix · 2026-02-20 · 10-K · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026010047/ko-20251231.htm

[17] KO 10-K filed 2026-02-20 · segment revenue contribution · 2026-02-20 · 10-K · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026010047/ko-20251231.htm

[18] KO 10-K filed 2026-02-20 · FY2025 gross margin · 2026-02-20 · 10-K · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026010047/ko-20251231.htm

[19] KO 10-Q filed 2026-07-29 · Africa bottling sale · 2026-07-29 · 10-Q · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026050503/ko-20260703.htm

[20] KO 10-K filed 2026-02-20 · five largest bottling partners · 2026-02-20 · 10-K · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026010047/ko-20251231.htm

[21] KO 10-K filed 2026-02-20 · bottler concentration risk · 2026-02-20 · 10-K · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026010047/ko-20251231.htm

[22] KO 8-K filed 2026-07-28 · chief executive statement · 2026-07-28 · 8-K · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026049922/a2026q2earningsreleaseex-9.htm

[23] KO 8-K filed 2026-06-25 · North America leadership change · 2026-06-25 · 8-K · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000155278126000366/e26287_ko-8k.htm

[24] KO 10-K filed 2026-02-20 · FY2025 income statement · 2026-02-20 · 10-K · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026010047/ko-20251231.htm

[25] KO 10-K filed 2026-02-20 · FY2025 operating margin · 2026-02-20 · 10-K · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026010047/ko-20251231.htm

[26] KO 10-K filed 2026-02-20 · FY2024 other operating charges · 2026-02-20 · 10-K · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026010047/ko-20251231.htm

[27] KO 10-K filed 2026-02-20 · FY2025 structural gains and charges · 2026-02-20 · 10-K · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026010047/ko-20251231.htm

[28] KO 10-K filed 2026-02-20 · FY2025 operating cash flow · 2026-02-20 · 10-K · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026010047/ko-20251231.htm

[29] KO 10-Q filed 2026-07-29 · fairlife milestone payment · 2026-07-29 · 10-Q · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026050503/ko-20260703.htm

[30] KO 10-K filed 2026-02-20 · dividends paid · 2026-02-20 · 10-K · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026010047/ko-20251231.htm

[31] KO 10-Q filed 2026-07-29 · Q2 income statement · 2026-07-29 · 10-Q · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026050503/ko-20260703.htm

[32] KO 10-Q filed 2026-07-29 · gross profit margin · 2026-07-29 · 10-Q · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026050503/ko-20260703.htm

[33] KO 10-Q filed 2026-07-29 · operating cash flow and capital spending · 2026-07-29 · 10-Q · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026050503/ko-20260703.htm

[34] KO earnings call 2026-07-28 · guidance · 2026-07-28 · earnings-call · https://investors.coca-colacompany.com/

[35] KO 10-K filed 2026-02-20 · sweeteners and raw materials · 2026-02-20 · 10-K · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026010047/ko-20251231.htm

[36] KO 10-Q filed 2026-07-29 · IRS tax litigation deposit · 2026-07-29 · 10-Q · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026050503/ko-20260703.htm

[37] KO 8-K filed 2026-07-28 · EMEA review · 2026-07-28 · 8-K · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026049922/a2026q2earningsreleaseex-9.htm

[38] KO 10-K filed 2026-02-20 · competition · 2026-02-20 · 10-K · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026010047/ko-20251231.htm

[39] KO earnings call 2026-07-28 · regional consumer conditions · 2026-07-28 · earnings-call · https://investors.coca-colacompany.com/

[40] KO 10-K filed 2026-02-20 · FY2025 revenue growth factors · 2026-02-20 · 10-K · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026010047/ko-20251231.htm

[41] KO earnings call 2026-07-28 · quarter assessment · 2026-07-28 · earnings-call · https://investors.coca-colacompany.com/

[42] KO 8-K filed 2026-07-28 · calendar days · 2026-07-28 · 8-K · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026049922/a2026q2earningsreleaseex-9.htm

[43] KO earnings call 2026-07-28 · Asia Pacific price/mix explanation · 2026-07-28 · earnings-call · https://investors.coca-colacompany.com/

[44] KO 10-Q filed 2026-07-29 · Asia Pacific operating income · 2026-07-29 · 10-Q · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026050503/ko-20260703.htm

[45] KO 10-Q filed 2026-07-29 · operating margin by segment · 2026-07-29 · 10-Q · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026050503/ko-20260703.htm

[46] KO 8-K filed 2026-07-28 · first-half segment table · 2026-07-28 · 8-K · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026049922/a2026q2earningsreleaseex-9.htm

[47] KO 10-Q filed 2026-07-29 · corporate expense · 2026-07-29 · 10-Q · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026050503/ko-20260703.htm

[48] KO earnings call 2026-04-28 · questions on costs and margin · 2026-04-28 · earnings-call · https://investors.coca-colacompany.com/

[49] KO earnings call 2026-07-28 · risks · 2026-07-28 · earnings-call · https://investors.coca-colacompany.com/

[50] KO earnings call 2026-07-28 · fairlife and tax update · 2026-07-28 · earnings-call · https://investors.coca-colacompany.com/

[51] KO 8-K filed 2026-07-28 · North America review · 2026-07-28 · 8-K · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026049922/a2026q2earningsreleaseex-9.htm

[52] KO 10-Q filed 2026-07-29 · North America operating income · 2026-07-29 · 10-Q · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026050503/ko-20260703.htm

[53] KO 10-Q filed 2026-07-29 · IRS tax litigation exposure · 2026-07-29 · 10-Q · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/21344/000162828026050503/ko-20260703.htm

[54] KO earnings call 2026-07-28 · IRS appeal timing · 2026-07-28 · earnings-call · https://investors.coca-colacompany.com/

[55] Zacks Equity Research 2026-08-05 · raised 2026 outlook review · 2026-08-05 · Zacks Investment Research · https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/coca-colas-raised-2026-outlook-164200770.html

Related:KO

Want deeper analysis?

Ask drillr anything about KO — powered by SEC filings, earnings calls, and real-time data.

Try drillr.ai for free

drillr can make mistakes. Information only — not investment advice. Learn more