JKS

• Strategic Shift & Leadership: New CEO Jimmy Du emphasizes moving from scale-driven growth to 'effective supply' and earnings quality. The company is optimizing order books, geographic mix, and product mix to improve profitability.
• Product Technology: Tiger Neo 3.0 modules command a premium of ~$0.01/W. Next-gen Tiger NEW 5.0 unveiled with 25.91% efficiency. By end-2026, >40 GW of TOPCON 3.0 capacity will be ready, meeting Level 1 energy efficiency standards under new Chinese regulations.
• Market Dynamics: Domestic China demand slowed significantly (-30% to -40% YoY), while overseas markets (>70% of H1 shipments) remain resilient. Global market share is expected to normalize around 10-12% as the company sacrifices low-margin volume for quality.
• Investment Platform: JKS operates an investment arm with ~RMB 1.86 billion invested in cash. Portfolio fair value is ~RMB 1.99 billion. Recent exits include Laplace Renewable Energy (cumulative gain >RMB 250 million).
• ESS Business: Adopting an asset-light model focusing on solutions (PCS/EMS) rather than cell manufacturing. No major capacity expansion planned; key investments are in technical teams and marketing.

• Module Shipments: Full-year 2026 guidance revised downward to 60-70 GW (from previous implicit higher targets), with high-efficiency products accounting for >60%. Q3 2026 shipment expected between 15-17 GW.
• ESS Shipments: Full-year 2026 ESS shipments expected to more than double year-over-year.
• Capacity: Annual integrated production capacity to reach ~100 GW by end-2026, including ~14 GW from overseas facilities.
• Financials: Full-year operating cash flow expected to improve compared to 2025. Capex for next two years expected to be minimal (~$500M-$1B worldwide), focused only on maintenance/minor upgrades.

Total revenue was $1.82 billion, down 31% year-over-year and flat sequentially. Gross margin was 4.2%, a significant decline from 8.3% in Q1 2026 but an improvement from 2.9% in Q2 2025. Operating loss margin widened to 11.6% from 4.8% in Q1 due to lower ASPs and higher operating expenses (primarily expected credit losses). Cash and cash equivalents stood at $2.5 billion. Module shipments reached approximately 16 GW in Q2, with H1 total shipments at 32.9 GW. Energy Storage System (ESS) shipments were 3.1 GWh in H1, with ~1.5 GWh recognized as revenue.

• Policy & Trade Barriers: Section 232 tariffs and potential import price floors in the US may increase module costs, though project ROI remains viable. EU and India also imposing barriers against Chinese-manufactured components.
• Credit Losses: Higher expected credit losses contributed to increased operating expenses in Q2, though management states no specific customer defaults occurred, attributing it to accounting aging adjustments.
• Market Competition: Intense competition from Tier 2/3 players using low-price strategies threatens margins. New national energy efficiency standards (Jan 2027) may phase out inefficient competitors but require significant R&D compliance.
• Demand Volatility: Sharp drop in China domestic utility demand poses structural risks to overall market size.

Q: How does the company balance shipment volumes vs. profitability, and why was the annual guidance lowered? / A: Management prioritized profitability and cash flow over scale, citing a 30-40% drop in China's utility demand. They reduced exposure to competitive domestic markets and focused on premium regions like the US and Europe. The 60-70 GW target reflects this strategic shift away from volume wars toward higher-quality orders and better margins.

Q: What is the impact of Section 232 tariffs on US pricing and Jinko's JV? / A: Tariffs are expected to raise US module prices, potentially to $0.42-$0.44/W, but project economics remain strong due to rising PPA rates. Jinko holds a minority stake in a US JV and does not control its operations. Management believes the policy supports reshoring and that inventory buffers will mitigate short-term disruptions.

Q: Why did gross margins compress in Q2 despite high-efficiency product sales? / A: Margins fell due to lower average selling prices (ASP) across the board and elevated ramp-up costs for the new Tiger Neo 3.0 facility. Additionally, higher silver costs from Q1 carried into Q2. Management expects a moderate margin rebound in Q3 as capacity utilization improves and input costs stabilize.

Q: What is the strategy for the Energy Storage System (ESS) business? / A: Jinko is pursuing an asset-light model, avoiding heavy battery cell manufacturing capex. Instead, they focus on integrating PCS, EMS, and smart O&M for specific scenarios like data centers (AIDC). With current cell/pack capacity sufficient, future investments target technical branding and solution development rather than hardware expansion.