XNCR
NASDAQ · Healthcare · Biotechnology · US
Next report
Analyst consensus
- Next report date
- Nov 4, 2026
- EPS estimate
- -$0.32
- Revenue estimate
- $59.1M
Latest reported
- Last report date
- Aug 5, 2026
- EPS actual
- -$0.29
- EPS estimate
- -$0.80
- Revenue actual
- $51.2M
- Revenue estimate
- $18.9M
Track record
Trailing twelve quarters
- EPS beats (12Q)
- 7
- EPS misses (12Q)
- 5
- EPS in line (12Q)
- 0
- Avg surprise (4Q)
- +19.0%
- Revenue beats (12Q)
- 6
Analyst ratings
Sell-side consensus
- Consensus
- Strong Buy
- Price target
- $31
- PT range
- $20 – $46
- Analysts
- 6
Q4 FY2023 · Feb 28, 2024
AI summary of management’s prepared remarks and analyst Q&A · For informational purposes only, not investment advice
Management highlights
• Focused pipeline and discovery work on T-cell engagers for solid tumors, with updates on vudalimab in prostate cancer (monotherapy cohort with encouraging responses) and initiation of a front-line non-small cell lung cancer study. • Partnerships with Amgen, including promising data from Xaluritamig in late-line prostate cancer. • Progress on XmAb bispecifics: XmAb819 (ENPP3 in renal cell carcinoma) advancing in dose escalation; XmAb808 (CD28 targeting) in Phase 1; XmAb541 (CLDN6) to start Phase 1 in H1 2024. • Strengthened balance sheet with partial monetization of royalties, ending 2023 with $697 million and runway into 2027. • Wrapping up Phase 1 work for XmAbs 564 and 662, focusing resources on T-cell engagers.
Guidance
• 2024 priorities focus on solid tumor bispecifics pipeline. • Intend to select next IND candidate later in 2024.
Segment performance
No specific segment performance data on absolute terms and revenue contribution provided in the transcript.
Risks & headwinds
Forward-looking statements subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and factors from the company's most recently filed annual report on Form 10-K, but no specific operational failures detailed in the Q&A.
Analyst Q&A
Q: Comment on when initial clinical data from ENPP3 study might be seen.
A: Bassil stated they are working on characterizing the dose and will disclose when close to having data to share.
Q: Bar for go-forward decisions on vudalimab mono and combo.
A: Dane discussed comparing with peer studies, with RECIST response and deep PSA response as key factors.
Q: Safety of vudalimab, including autoimmune hepatitis and pause of XmAb564.
A: Bassil said XmAb564 pause was strategy-driven due to focus on T-cell engagers; Nancy discussed the single hepatitis case and monitoring protocols.
Q: Monotherapy data molecular subtype, PSA comparison.
A: Bassil said the monotherapy study isn't subdivided by molecular subtype; Dane explained PSA differences due to measurable disease vs. bone-only patients.
Q: Safety vs IPI/NIVO, dose going forward, enrollment numbers, bone responses.
A: Nancy said vudalimab safety is similar to other checkpoint inhibitors; dose is Q3 week flat; aiming for ~30 patients in monotherapy and combo cohorts.
Q: Background of confirmed responders, low-hanging fruit in mCRPC.
A: Nancy discussed heavily pretreated patients; Dane talked about comparators and future combination possibilities.
Q: Benchmark for vudalimab monotherapy, quality-of-life data.
A: Dane said waiting for cohort totals and using peer studies as comparators, with future plans to evaluate quality-of-life once cohorts are larger
Reported results against consensus at the time of each report · Surprise is computed from the estimate on record · Data as of Nov 4, 2026