FCEL

• Data Center Strategy & Commercialization: Fuel Cell Energy is pivoting toward distributed generation for AI data centers, addressing power constraints. They secured their first order with Fit Energy for up to 380 MW across four phases, increasing committed backlog to $1.3 billion and awarded capacity backlog to $2.4 billion, totaling $3.6 billion.
• Manufacturing Expansion: The Torrington, CT facility is expanding to increase annualized production from ~37 MW to 100 MW by October 2026, with a long-term goal of 500 MW by June 2028. This expansion is fully funded via equity proceeds.
• Strategic Partnerships: Signed an MOU with Siemens to optimize electrical balance-of-plant systems for large-scale projects. Delivered the first two carbon capture modules at ExxonMobil’s Rotterdam refinery, validating industrial-scale carbon capture capabilities.
• Supply Chain Security: Emphasizes a supply chain reliant on abundant commodity metals (nickel, steel) rather than rare earths, with >90% domestic sourcing and high recyclability rates.
• Global Execution: Successfully completed the repowering of the 42-module Yonggi Green Energy project in South Korea, demonstrating operational capability for complex overseas projects.

• EBITDA Target: Management targets positive adjusted EBITDA in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2027.
• Production Milestones: Aiming to achieve an annualized production rate of 100 megawatts by October 2026.
• Revenue Recognition: Expect to begin recognizing revenue for Phase 0 of the Fit Energy deal in Q4 FY2026.
• Backlog Conversion: Guidance relies heavily on converting 'awarded capacity backlog' ($2.4B) into 'committed backlog,' noting that conversion timing and amounts are subject to customer election and definitive agreement execution.

Total revenue for Q3 FY2026 was $33 million, a 29% decline from $46.7 million in the prior year period. The breakdown is as follows: Products revenue was $18 million (down from $26 million), reflecting fewer module deliveries to South Korea; Service revenue was $2.4 million (down from $3.1 million); Generation revenue was $8.8 million (down from $12.4 million) due to lower output from plants like Groton, which was out of service for planned upgrades; and Advanced technology contract revenue was $3.8 million (down from $5.3 million). Revenue contribution percentages were approximately 55% for Products, 7% for Service, 27% for Generation, and 12% for Advanced Technology.

• Cost Structure Mismatch: Recorded $17 million in charges ($4M inventory write-down, $13M purchase commitment losses) because current manufacturing costs exceed contractual pricing for Phase 0 of the Fit Energy deal.
• Conversion Uncertainty: Awarded capacity backlog does not guarantee future revenue; customers have sole option to proceed, and amounts may not convert or may convert differently than estimated.
• Operational Scaling Risks: No assurance that production rates, cost reductions, or backlog conversion will occur within expected timeframes.
• Customer Concentration/Dependency: Progress depends on Fit Energy's election to proceed with subsequent phases and alignment with customer delivery schedules.

Q: Analyst asked for details on the 75 MW Texas capacity reservation timeline and potential follow-on opportunities. / A: CEO Jason Few stated the deal was closed post-quarter with a major colocation operator. While specific timelines aren't disclosed yet, they anticipate follow-on opportunities with the same customer. The agreement aligns with market trends in Texas requiring 'bring your own power,' allowing Fuel Cell Energy to provide behind-the-meter power while customers finalize data center designs.

Q: Analyst questioned how the significant cost of revenue charges related to the Fit Energy deal would impact future financials and revenue recognition. / A: CFO Mike Bishop confirmed that revenue for Phase 0 will be recognized in Q4 FY2026. He explained that the associated costs are one-time charges linked to low initial production volumes. These costs are expected to normalize and be absorbed as production scales up to the targeted 100 MW run rate, supporting the path to positive adjusted EBITDA in Q4 FY2027.

Q: Analyst sought clarification on the operational differences of the ExxonMobil carbon capture modules and the broader partnership scope. / A: CEO Few clarified that the two delivered modules focus on capturing 90%+ of CO2 from point-source emissions while simultaneously producing power, thermal energy, and hydrogen. This demonstrates the platform's unique capability beyond standard power generation. The successful demonstration aims to validate the technology for broader global industrial decarbonization applications, leveraging strong political support for carbon capture incentives.

Q: Analyst asked about the bridge between reaching the 100 MW production rate and achieving EBITDA profitability, specifically regarding cost reduction and customer discretion. / A: CFO Bishop outlined that key drivers include converting awarded capacity to committed contracts, aligning with customer schedules, and executing cost reductions through scale. He emphasized that while some factors depend on customer elections, the company has a defined cost reduction curve and a diverse pipeline, reducing reliance on single customers. Manufacturing scaling is underway with new shifts and hiring already initiated.

Q: Analyst inquired about the non-sequential nature of the Fit Energy phases and whether later phases could proceed before earlier ones are fully operational. / A: CEO Few confirmed that the phases are not strictly sequential. The gating factor for proceeding to Phases 1-3 is Fit Energy's ability to close agreements with its downstream customers, which can happen at any time. This flexibility allows Fit Energy to secure commitments based on their deployment schedule rather than waiting for the completion of previous installations.