The Procter & Gamble Company
- Open
- 153.01
- Day high
- 154.32
- Day low
- 149.31
- Prev close
- 151.48
- Volume
- 6.6M
- Mkt cap
- $349.2B
- P/E (TTM)
- 21.5
- EPS (TTM)
- $6.99
- P/B
- 6.4
- P/S
- 4.0
- Yield
- 2.84%
- Per share
- $3.20
The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) is a Consumer Defensive company listed on NYSE. The stock is down 3% over the past year. Drillr has 4 published research articles covering PG.
The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) financials & analyst ratings
Fundamentals (TTM)
Analyst consensus · 7 analysts
Source: exchange market data + company filings. Figures are trailing-twelve-month or as most recently reported. For informational purposes only — not investment advice.
PG earnings date, history & EPS estimates
| Report date | EPS est | EPS actual | Surprise | Revenue | Rev. surprise |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2026 | $1.56 | $1.59 | +1.9% | $21.2B | +3.4% |
| Jan 22, 2026 | $1.86 | $1.88 | +1.1% | $22.2B | -0.4% |
| Oct 24, 2025 | $1.90 | $1.99 | +4.7% | $22.4B | +0.9% |
| Apr 24, 2025 | $1.52 | $1.54 | +1.3% | $19.8B | -1.9% |
| Jan 22, 2025 | $1.89 | $1.88 | -0.5% | $21.9B | +1.4% |
| Oct 18, 2024 | $1.90 | $1.93 | +1.6% | $21.7B | -1.1% |
| Apr 19, 2024 | $1.41 | $1.52 | +7.8% | $20.2B | -1.2% |
| Jan 23, 2024 | $1.70 | $1.84 | +8.2% | $21.4B | -0.2% |
| Oct 18, 2023 | $1.72 | $1.83 | +6.4% | $21.9B | +7.0% |
| Jul 28, 2023 | $1.32 | $1.37 | +3.8% | $20.6B | +13.9% |
| Apr 21, 2023 | $1.32 | $1.37 | +3.8% | $20.1B | +0.4% |
| Jan 19, 2023 | $1.59 | $1.59 | +0.0% | $20.8B | +0.1% |
PG insider trading activity (SEC Form 4)
| Date | Insider | Type | Shares | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2026 | McEvoy Ashleydirector | Grant | 202 | — |
| Jun 10, 2026 | Kempczinski Christopher Jdirector | Grant | 258 | — |
| Jun 10, 2026 | ARNOLD CRAIGdirector | Grant | 202 | — |
| Jun 10, 2026 | McCarthy Christine Mdirector | Grant | 253 | — |
| Jun 10, 2026 | JIMENEZ JOSEPHdirector | Grant | 320 | — |
| Jun 10, 2026 | Portman Robert Jonesdirector | Grant | 51 | — |
| Mar 19, 2026 | Portman Robert Jonesdirector | Grant | 49 | — |
| Mar 11, 2026 | ARNOLD CRAIGdirector | Grant | 161 | — |
| Mar 11, 2026 | Portman Robert Jonesdirector | Grant | 193 | — |
| Mar 11, 2026 | Kempczinski Christopher Jdirector | Grant | 201 | — |
| Mar 11, 2026 | McEvoy Ashleydirector | Grant | 161 | — |
| Mar 11, 2026 | McCarthy Christine Mdirector | Grant | 209 | — |
| Mar 11, 2026 | JIMENEZ JOSEPHdirector | Grant | 273 | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | Francisco Ma. Fatimaofficer: CEO - Baby, Fem & Family Care | Sell | 130 | $165.30 |
| Mar 2, 2026 | Francisco Ma. Fatimaofficer: CEO - Baby, Fem & Family Care | Sell | 120 | $165.31 |
Source: PG SEC Form 4 filings, latest Jun 10, 2026. For informational purposes only — not investment advice.
See the full PG insider & 13F page →PG research & analysis
PG Q3 Beats: Sales +7%, Tariff Headwind Cleared
Procter & Gamble's fiscal Q3 results met Wall Street expectations, clearing tariff and margin fears that drove the March selloff. The stock is positioned for a 1-2% tactical move as the downside case is removed, but muted peer response signals limited sector read-through. The trade is a 30-day long in PG, fading if Q4 fails to show margin expansion or if broader market volatility exceeds 5%.
CLKMBXLPStrait of Hormuz Blockade Risk: PG and COST Win While TGT and CAT Face the Squeeze
Potential Strait of Hormuz blockade risks broad inflation, favoring pricing power staples like PG, COST, and WMT while pressuring discretionary TGT and input-heavy CAT/DE. Analysis ranks PG highest conviction amid TTM metrics showing superior margins and growth resilience.
COSTWMTTGTUMich Warns Consumers Are Breaking — Why WMT and COST Win While NKE and SBUX Lose
UMich economist flags stretched US consumers amid high prices, driving trade-down to discounters like WMT, COST, TGT while hurting NKE, SBUX. Staples PG holds steady. Ranked picks favor value plays with strong financials.
WMTCOSTTGTStagflation Trade 2026: 6 Stocks Built to Win — XOM, NEM, COST Lead
Stagflation trades are gaining traction as inflation sticks and growth slows; energy giants XOM and CVX top the list for cash flow, followed by gold miner NEM, staples PG/COST, and utility NEE. Ranked conviction favors commodity producers with strong balance sheets.
XOMCVXNEM
The Procter & Gamble Company company profile
Overview
The Procter & Gamble Company (NYSE:PG) is one of the world's largest consumer goods companies, founded in 1837 in Cincinnati, Ohio. What began as a small candle and soap business between William Procter and James Gamble has evolved into a global consumer products giant with operations spanning over 180 countries. Today, P&G operates through five major business segments and owns some of the world's most recognizable household brands including Tide, Pampers, Gillette, Crest, and Olay. The company has maintained its position as a market leader through consistent innovation, brand building, and strategic focus on daily-use consumer products that generate recurring demand.
Business
Procter & Gamble operates in the consumer packaged goods industry, manufacturing and marketing branded household and personal care products that consumers use daily. The company's business is organized into five distinct segments that collectively cover most aspects of personal and home care: Beauty segment (approximately 18% of revenue) includes hair care products like Head & Shoulders, Pantene, and Herbal Essences shampoos and conditioners, plus skin care and personal cleansing products under premium brands like Olay and SK-II, as well as antiperspirants and deodorants including Old Spice and Secret. Grooming segment (approximately 9% of revenue) focuses primarily on shave care through the Gillette and Venus razor brands, plus Braun electric shavers and grooming appliances. This segment serves the global market for razors, blades, and shaving accessories. Health Care segment (approximately 12% of revenue) encompasses oral care products like Crest toothpaste and Oral-B toothbrushes, plus over-the-counter health products including Pepto-Bismol, Vicks respiratory care, and Metamucil digestive health products. Fabric & Home Care segment (approximately 32% of revenue, the largest segment) includes laundry detergents like Tide and Ariel, fabric enhancers like Downy, and home cleaning products including Dawn dish soap, Mr. Clean, Swiffer cleaning systems, and Febreze air care products. Baby, Feminine & Family Care segment (approximately 29% of revenue) covers baby care products primarily through the Pampers diaper brand, feminine care products like Always and Tampax, adult incontinence products, and paper products including Charmin toilet paper, Bounty paper towels, and Puffs tissues. These products are considered fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) or consumer staples - everyday necessities that consumers purchase regularly regardless of economic conditions. The products are designed to solve common household problems like cleaning, personal hygiene, and health maintenance, creating consistent demand patterns that make P&G's revenue relatively predictable and recession-resistant.
Revenue model
Procter & Gamble generates revenue primarily through direct product sales to retailers, who then sell to end consumers. The company operates a traditional manufacturer-to-retailer-to-consumer model, earning money when retailers purchase P&G products for their stores. Key customers include mass merchandisers like Walmart and Target, grocery store chains, drug stores like CVS and Walgreens, membership clubs like Costco, and increasingly, e-commerce platforms including Amazon. E-commerce now represents approximately 18% of total sales and has been growing at high single-digit rates. The business model benefits from several margin-enhancing factors. Brand strength allows P&G to command premium pricing compared to generic alternatives - consumers willingly pay more for trusted brands like Tide or Pampers. Scale economies in manufacturing, procurement, and marketing spread fixed costs across massive production volumes. Innovation capabilities enable the company to introduce higher-margin premium products and justify price increases. Category leadership in most segments provides negotiating power with retailers and prime shelf space. However, several factors can pressure margins. Commodity cost inflation for raw materials like petroleum-based chemicals, pulp, and packaging materials directly impacts input costs. Recent earnings calls highlighted $2-3 billion in annual commodity headwinds. Foreign exchange fluctuations affect international operations, with recent dollar strength creating $1+ billion revenue headwinds. Competitive pressure from private label brands and new entrants can force promotional spending or limit pricing power. Retail concentration gives major customers like Walmart significant negotiating leverage. Consumer trade-down behavior during economic stress can shift demand toward lower-margin value tiers within P&G's portfolio or to competitors' cheaper alternatives. The company has responded to margin pressure through productivity initiatives targeting over $2 billion in annual cost savings, strategic pricing increases across most categories, and continuous innovation to justify premium positioning. Management emphasizes maintaining investment in brand building and product superiority even during challenging periods, viewing these as essential for long-term competitive advantage.
Competitive moat
Procter & Gamble possesses a strong economic moat built primarily on brand strength and consumer switching costs, though this moat faces evolving challenges. The company's primary competitive advantage lies in its portfolio of trusted household brands that have been built over decades through consistent quality, innovation, and marketing investment. Brands like Tide, Pampers, and Gillette have achieved what marketers call "top-of-mind awareness" - consumers automatically think of these brands when they need laundry detergent, diapers, or razors. This brand strength creates customer switching costs that go beyond price. Consumers develop habits and preferences around daily-use products, and the perceived risk of switching to an unfamiliar brand often outweighs potential savings. A parent satisfied with Pampers diapers is unlikely to experiment with a cheaper alternative given the potential consequences of product failure. Similarly, consumers who achieve desired results with Tide detergent have little incentive to try competitors. P&G's moat is further strengthened by scale advantages in research and development, manufacturing, and marketing. The company can invest hundreds of millions in developing new products and spreading these costs across global sales volumes that smaller competitors cannot match. Manufacturing scale enables cost advantages and quality consistency that private label manufacturers struggle to replicate. However, the moat faces meaningful challenges. Private label competition has improved significantly in quality while maintaining substantial price advantages, particularly pressuring mid-tier P&G products. Direct-to-consumer brands like Dollar Shave Club (acquired by Unilever) have disrupted traditional categories by offering convenience and subscription models. E-commerce platforms make it easier for consumers to discover and try new brands, reducing the distribution advantages that historically protected incumbents. Changing consumer preferences toward natural, sustainable, or specialized products have enabled smaller brands to gain market share in categories like personal care and cleaning products. Younger consumers show less brand loyalty and more willingness to experiment, potentially weakening P&G's traditional advantages over time. Despite these challenges, P&G's moat remains substantial due to the daily-use nature of its products, the high cost of building competing brands, and the company's ability to innovate and adapt its portfolio. The moat is likely durable but not impregnable, requiring continuous investment to maintain.
Risks & safety
P&G demonstrates a solid margin of safety with strong financial fundamentals, though some metrics warrant attention: • Liquidity position: $9-12 billion in cash and short-term investments provides substantial cushion, though current ratio of 0.71-0.76 indicates current liabilities exceed current assets - typical for consumer goods companies with strong cash flow generation • Debt management: Debt-to-equity ratio of 0.65-0.70 is moderate and manageable for a stable cash flow business; total debt appears well within the company's capacity to service given consistent profitability • Cash generation: Strong free cash flow of $13-17 billion annually provides significant financial flexibility and supports the dividend; operating cash flow consistently exceeds capital expenditure requirements • Valuation metrics: Trading at P/E ratios of 21-32x across recent quarters, above historical averages but reflecting quality premium; EV/EBITDA of 15-22x suggests moderate valuation for a defensive consumer staples company • Profitability stability: Net margins of 15-21% demonstrate consistent profitability; return on equity of 7-30% (varying by quarter) indicates efficient capital utilization • Other considerations: Faces near-term headwinds from tariffs ($1-1.5 billion impact expected), commodity inflation, and foreign exchange pressures, but these are largely cyclical rather than structural threats
Recent development
Over the past several years, P&G has pursued a focused strategy centered on what management calls "superiority across five vectors" - product performance, packaging, brand communication, retail execution, and value proposition. This approach has driven consistent innovation across the portfolio, with recent launches including Crest 3D White Deep Stain Remover, Oral-B iO power toothbrush series, Tide OxyBoost Power Pods, and Tide Evo recyclable detergent packaging. The company has made significant investments in digital capabilities and e-commerce, with online sales growing to 18% of total revenue and increasing at high single-digit rates. This includes both direct-to-consumer initiatives and partnerships with major e-commerce platforms like Amazon. P&G has also enhanced its digital marketing capabilities to better target consumers and measure advertising effectiveness. Sustainability initiatives have become increasingly central to P&G's strategy, with innovations like Tide Evo's recyclable packaging and broader commitments to environmental responsibility. The company views sustainability both as a consumer demand driver and a cost management opportunity through more efficient resource utilization. Geographically, P&G has faced significant challenges in China and other international markets. The SK-II premium beauty brand has struggled with changing consumer preferences and increased competition, contributing to overall China market declines of 2-15% in recent quarters. Management expects gradual improvement but acknowledges these markets may take time to recover to historical growth rates. The company has also emphasized productivity improvements, targeting over $2 billion in annual cost savings through supply chain optimization, automation, and operational efficiency gains. These savings help offset commodity inflation and fund continued investment in innovation and marketing. Recent earnings calls highlight management's commitment to maintaining brand investment levels even during challenging periods, viewing this as essential for long-term competitive positioning.
PG company profile · for informational purposes only — not investment advice.
Track PG with Drillr
SEC filings, earnings calls, insider activity, alt-data signals — all queryable through Drillr's AI terminal and MCP API.
Try Drillr for free