SAIC

• Strong Operational Execution: Results exceeded expectations, driven by double-digit margins, robust free cash flow, and disciplined bidding focused on mission-oriented pursuits.
• Win Rate & Pipeline: Re-compete win rate exceeded 90%, securing base security. New business win rates are at or above 30%. Qualified pipeline remains strong despite uneven procurement activity.
• Key Wins: Booked over $1.6 billion in Intel Space Awards in H1 FY27. Secured recompete wins for Army hardware-software integration and critical border security programs.
• Project Orbit Implementation: Launched 'Project Orbit' to optimize resources and improve agility. Focuses on six themes including 'Buy Smarter' (procurement restructuring), recruiting efficiency, and AI-driven capacity scaling without headcount increases.
• Strategic Review: Conducting a portfolio and strategy review to identify intersections of 'right to win' and growth potential, aiming for sharper strategic focus rather than fundamental identity change.
• Investment in Capabilities: Investing in quantum solutions and AI tools to bridge technology gaps and support national security missions.

• FY27 Revenue: Raised by 2% to a midpoint of $7.25 billion. Implies organic contraction of 2% to flat in the second half due to the RITS contract rolling off (~350 bps headwind).
• FY27 Adjusted EBITDA: Raised by 4% at the midpoint, implying margins of 10.3% to 10.5% (20 basis points above previous guidance).
• FY27 EPS: Raised, reflecting strong first-half performance and cost efficiencies.
• FY27 Free Cash Flow: Maintained expectation of at least $600 million ($14 per share).
• Long-Term Margin Target: Mid-teens expected for next year; path to approximately 11% margin by FY30 as Project Orbit benefits materialize.

Revenue: $1.9 billion, representing organic growth of approximately 5%. Adjusted EBITDA: $193 million with a margin of 10.3% (up modestly year-over-year excluding prior favorable legal settlements). Free Cash Flow: $131 million. Net Leverage: Reduced to 3.0x.

• Procurement Delays: Large opportunities slipping to the right due to government efforts to 'do more with less' and implement fixed-price directives, resulting in a quarterly book-to-bill of 0.6.
• Contract Extensions: Slower RFPs and awards have led to increased ceiling utilization and contract extensions, impacting near-term revenue recognition velocity.
• Budget Uncertainty: Base case assumes a Continuing Resolution (CR) at the start of the next fiscal year; growth is not dependent on large budget increases.
• Execution Risk: Project Orbit requires sustained, fundamental process changes over three years; failure to execute could delay structural savings and margin improvements.

Q: Analyst asked about the drivers of strong On-Contract Growth (OCG) and assumptions for the second half.

A: CEO Jim Regan attributed OCG strength to customers moving money faster across the board, not limited to specific sectors. CFO Prabu Natarajan clarified that while Q1/Q2 hit $250M against a $300M plan, the team assumes ~5% OCG for H2. He noted that ~$2B in recent Single Award IDIQ wins are converting to revenue via task orders within 12 months, boosting OCG without immediately appearing in backlog.

Q: Analyst inquired about the origination of Project Orbit and how $150M in savings will be achieved in a labor-intensive business.

A: CEO stated Orbit stems from identifying operational 'gunk' and inefficiencies post-split, crowdsourcing 3,500 ideas from employees. CFO added that Orbit aims for revenue maximization alongside cost reduction, investing ~$100M of the $150M savings back into growth and infrastructure, viewing it as a structural improvement rather than blunt cost-cutting.

Q: Analyst questioned the shape of margin improvement over the next few years under Project Orbit.

A: CFO explained that while the long-term target is ~11% by FY30, progress may not be linear. Near-term margins might fluctuate within 20-30 bps of 10.7-10.8% as new business wins pressure margins initially. CEO emphasized that Orbit allows self-disruption to invest in growth, prioritizing operational efficiency over immediate margin expansion.

Q: Analyst asked about the shift toward Fixed-Price Contracts (FFP) and its impact on margins.

A: CFO noted FFP is currently 15-18% of sales but the pipeline is inflecting toward ~33% FFP. Civil business runs high single-digit FFP margins (~15%), suggesting upside if this mix expands. However, Defense/Intel shifts are slower; the company is training teams on FFP models to prepare for future customer mandates, viewing this as a longer-term lever.

Q: Analyst asked about the sustainability of the >90% re-compete win rate and its impact on growth.

A: CEO set a standard of maintaining re-compete win rates at or above 90%. CFO explained that historically, below-90% re-compete rates created 5-8% annual revenue headwinds. Achieving >90% creates a growth floor, which, combined with >30% new business win rates, should drive a flywheel effect for revenue growth.