EPS · actual vs est
Revenue · actual vs est
Summary
Generated 2024-09-26
Management highlights
- Team execution in the second quarter was strong with positive sales trends, strong margins, cost efficiencies, and EPS growth while managing industry-wide auto loan loss pressure.
- Completed nationwide rollout of new order processing system across stores and customer experience centers, and testing new knowledge management system leveraging generative AI in CECs.
- Launched EV Hub on carmax.com, and made enhancements in finance-based shopping.
- Optimized logistics network by centralizing home delivery, appraisal pickup, and Max offer moves by market, and continuing to evaluate logistics operations for efficiencies.
- Omnichannel selling model continues to be more efficient with progress in digital progression tools.
Segment performance
For the second quarter of FY ‘25, CarMax's diversified business model had total sales of $7 billion, down 1% year-over-year. In retail business, total unit sales increased 5.1% with used unit comps up 4.3%, but average selling price declined approximately $1,250 per unit or 5% year-over-year. Second quarter retail gross profit per used unit was $2,269, consistent with last year. Unit sales in wholesale business were down 0.3% year-over-year, but average selling price declined approximately $1,150 per unit or 13% year-over-year. Second quarter wholesale gross profit per unit was $975, in line with last year. CarMax bought approximately 300,000 vehicles during the quarter, up 3% from last year. CarMax Auto Finance (CAF) delivered income of $116 million, down 14% from the same period last year, pressured by industry-wide loss uptick.
Guidance
Management feels good about sales in the second-half of the year assuming current market conditions continue. Continuing to test the new full spectrum underwriting model.
Risks
- Industry-wide auto loan loss pressure. - Credit risk with some customers facing challenges and need for continued monitoring and tightening of underwriting strategy.
Q&A highlights
Q: Seth Basham asked about how unit comps are trending quarter-to-date?
A: Bill Nash said comp cadence for the quarter sequentially got better, with September trending positive for the quarter in line with the second quarter but a little bit softer, noting day of week headwinds.
Q: Sharon Zackfia asked about the profitability of CAF and when it can start to grow again?
A: Jon Daniels said NIM has been managed well, and provision is a function of origination mix and performance, hoping for tailwinds from rate trends and better provision in future quarters.
Q: John Murphy asked about sourcing from dealers and what changed?
A: Bill Nash said the shortage of late model vehicles has bottomed out, and Edmunds team has done a great job with more dealers active on instant appraisal offers and better access to leases.
Q: Brian Nagel asked about underpins in improving used car unit comps and the loan loss provision?
A: Bill Nash said it's a combination of internal execution, price declines, and stable pricing environment; Jon Daniels said loan loss provision adjustments are based on portfolio performance and industry trends.
Q: Rajat Gupta asked about September comms and advertising spending?
A: Bill Nash said September sales trend is positive; Enrique Mayor-Mora said marketing spend is in line with expectations for the year with quarter-to-quarter variation.
Q: David Bellinger asked about contingencies for potential downshift in volumes and digital progression tools?
A: Jon Daniels said industry tightening and consumer affordability issues are factors; Bill Nash said digital progression tools rolled out everywhere and improve customer experience.
Q: Craig Kennison asked about online sales percentage and unit profitability?
A: Bill Nash said 15% online sales with more focus on omni-channel, and Enrique Mayor-Mora said omni-selling model is more efficient and should continue to accelerate.
Q: Scot Ciccarelli asked about provision change and subprime pockets?
A: Jon Daniels said provision is a function of origination mix and performance, with Tier 1 having lower loss range and Tier 3 having higher loss level.
Q: Chris Pierce asked about CDK impact and other gross margins?
A: Bill Nash said CDK had no material impact; Enrique Mayor-Mora said other gross margins are expected to continue improving with potential $10 million impact from logistics optimization.
Q: Ian Davis asked about credit penetration constraints and non-procuring finance customers?
A: Jon Daniels said CAF aims to be a full spectrum lender, with non-procuring finance customers being rate-sensitive and cash-conscious, and penetration expected to grow over time.
Q: John Healy asked about reconditioning and ad expense?
A: Bill Nash said reconditioning is a focus with ongoing improvements; Enrique Mayor-Mora said ad expense was purely timing with first half in line with expectations.
Q: David Whiston asked about financing channel consumers and capital allocation?
A: Jon Daniels said higher-end consumers are rate-sensitive and cash buyers; Enrique Mayor-Mora said buybacks are on the pace communicated for the balance of the year
Key numbers
Reported versus consensus
Earnings calendar feed
| Metric | Reported | Consensus | Delta | Prior year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPS | $0.85 | $0.86 | -1.2% | — |
| Revenue | $7.01B | $6.83B | +2.7% | — |
Transcript
September 26, 2024Full transcript unavailable for redistribution
The structured summary above covers the available call sections. Full transcript text is not included on this page.
Continue exploring
Prior quarters
This page presents the stored structured earnings-call summary and deterministic earnings calendar values. How this is generated. For informational purposes only; not investment advice.