NICE Stock: Insider Activity, Filings & Research
Drillr aggregates AI research, SEC filings, earnings signals and alt-data for NICE. 11 published articles.
Insider Activity
Over the trailing 90-day window, NICE Systems insiders recorded no open-market purchases and no open-market sales, resulting in zero net insider buying activity. The insider sentiment score stands at 50/100, indicating a neutral stance. The absence of cluster buying and lack of first-buy-in-quarters activity suggest limited conviction among corporate executives during this period. Against this backdrop, the stock declined 21.4% over three months, while institutional 13F positioning has remained mixed. The combination of flat insider activity and divergent institutional flows reflects an absence of clear directional signals from either group.
Updated Jun 4, 2026 · based on SEC Form 4 filings · not investment advice
| Date | Insider | Type | Shares | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2026 | Simon Zehavadirector | Option | 696 | $0.29 |
| Apr 2, 2026 | Russell Scott Edwardofficer: Chief Executive Officer | Tax | 2,051 | $110.26 |
Source: NICE SEC Form 4 filings, latest May 14, 2026. For informational purposes only — not investment advice.
Research
US AML Overhaul Hits JPM, BAC and PYPL — While NICE, FISV and JKHY Stand to Win
US AML regulatory proposal burdens banks like JPM, BAC, PYPL with costs but fuels demand for NICE, FISV, JKHY compliance tech. Article analyzes exposure, metrics, and ranks picks.
JPMBACPYPLThe 2027 CCaaS AI Inflection: Ranking NICE, Five9, and Verint on Agent Monetization Readiness
NICE leads the 2027 CCaaS AI inflection ranking on the strength of its $2.97B revenue base, 66.4% gross margins, $703M FCF, and Enlighten AI platform already embedded in enterprise contracts. Verint takes second with the most aggressive AI monetization model (per-bot pricing) but carries execution risk from slower growth and leverage. Five9, despite best-in-class cloud architecture, lacks a proprietary AI layer and trades at a valuation discount that reflects this structural gap.
FIVNVRNTAI Agents vs. Human Contact Centers: Mapping the Winners and Losers Across a $500B Market
AI agents are restructuring the $500B contact center market, creating clear winners (cloud platform vendors like NICE, Five9, and Salesforce) and losers (BPO operators like Concentrix and TTEC whose human-labor model is under structural assault). NICE leads on profitability and AI product maturity at an undemanding valuation; TTEC and Concentrix face secular headcount displacement with limited credible AI pivots.
FIVNCRMCNXCFive9 vs. NICE: Why the 8x Margin Gap Tells the Real AI Contact Center Story
NICE's 22.2% operating margin dwarfs Five9's 2.8% in FY2025 — an 8x gap rooted in an 11.7pp gross margin advantage and superior SG&A leverage from 2.6x greater scale. However, Five9's margin trajectory is inflecting sharply, with operating margins improving from -5.8% to +7.3% over five quarters, and its forward P/E of 5.3x versus NICE's 11.0x prices in significant upside if the trend holds.
FIVNWhich enterprise verticals are switching CCaaS vendors fastest — and does Five9 or NICE win those deals?
NICE dominates enterprise-wide CCaaS vendor switches — particularly in financial services — with 66% gross margins and 22% operating margins, while Five9 wins mid-market and BPO deals at faster growth rates but thinner margins. At 5.3x forward P/E, Five9 is a turnaround bet; NICE at 11x forward earnings is the quality compounder in a market where Amazon Connect looms as the disruptive low-cost entrant.
FIVNTWLOAMZNDoes Twilio or Amazon Connect pose a bigger substitution threat to Five9 and NICE than each other?
Amazon Connect poses a greater substitution threat to Five9 and NICE than Twilio due to AWS's enterprise distribution advantage, AI infrastructure dominance, and disruptive per-minute pricing model. Five9 is more vulnerable than NICE given its narrower product suite and $33M operating income vs. NICE's $660M, leaving less room to invest defensively against platform giants.
TWLOAMZNFIVNCan Five9's agentic AI close the margin gap with NICE, or does scale win in CCaaS?
NICE dominates Five9 on profitability with a 19pp EBIT margin advantage and 15x more net income, but Five9's dramatic inflection to GAAP profitability in FY 2025 — from -$82M to +$39M net income in two years — suggests agentic AI is closing the gap. Scale still wins on absolute economics, making NICE the quality hold while Five9 is the speculative bet at 1.3x EV/Sales.
FIVNCan Contact Center BPOs Pivot to AI Services Before Volume Erosion Becomes Structural?
AI agents are automating the routine interactions that have supported BPO headcount models for decades, with Salesforce AgentForce and NICE Enlighten now deployed at enterprise scale. Among legacy BPOs, Concentrix and TTEC show acute financial distress from volume erosion and leverage, while TaskUs offers the most credible pivot into AI services — trading at just 7x forward earnings despite 19% revenue growth. NICE remains the highest-conviction CCaaS infrastructure play as contact centers modernize.
CNXCTTECTASKWho Wins the $500B Contact Center AI Disruption — NICE, Salesforce, or the New Entrants?
The $500B contact center market is undergoing structural disruption as AI agents replace human representatives at scale, creating a clear opportunity for cloud CCaaS and infrastructure providers. NICE and Salesforce lead the field with defensible AI platforms and strong profitability, while Five9 faces a binary outcome and Twilio offers durable infrastructure exposure across the broader AI agent ecosystem.
CRMFIVNTWLOAt What AI Agent Attach Rate Does CCaaS Revenue Mix Shift Structurally — and Who Gets There First?
The structural inflection in CCaaS occurs when AI agent autonomous-handle-rates cross 20-25%, shifting revenue mix from seat-based to consumption-weighted AI pricing. Salesforce has the highest probability of getting there first via Agentforce's installed-base scale, while NICE offers the best risk-adjusted valuation for investors positioning ahead of the 2027 inflection. Five9 and Verint are higher-variance bets on the pace of enterprise AI adoption.
FIVNVRNTCRMNICE vs. Five9 vs. Verint: Which CCaaS Platform Is Most Ready to Monetize AI Agents by 2027?
NICE, Five9, and Verint are competing to monetize AI agents in the CCaaS market by 2027. NICE leads on financial strength ($2.97B revenue, 22.5% FCF margin) and has the most advanced consumption-based AI pricing model; Five9 shows improving momentum but faces structural margin headwinds; Verint's WEM-focused open platform is differentiated but revenue growth is lagging. NICE is best positioned to convert AI agent adoption into durable revenue at scale.
FIVNVRNT
Track NICE with Drillr
SEC filings, earnings calls, insider activity, alt-data signals — all queryable through Drillr's AI terminal and MCP API.
Try Drillr for free