Skip to content
PEG

Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.

Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc. Q2 FY2025 earnings call

August 5, 2025 · fiscal period ended 2025-06

EPS · actual vs est

/

Revenue · actual vs est

/
Ask about this call

Summary

Generated 2025-08-05

Management highlights

  • PSE&G is on track to execute its $3.8 billion regulated investment program. Benefited from regulatory recovery of over $3 billion from the 2024 electric and gas distribution base rate case.
  • Nuclear units had high capacity factor; Salem upgrade project to add ~200 MW of carbon-free power.
  • Addressed customer affordability with initiatives like deferred billing, showoff protections, and energy assistance payments.
  • Large load inquiries for new service connections grew to over 9,400 MW, up 47% from March 31.
View in transcript ↓

Segment performance

PSE&G reported second quarter 2025 net income and non-GAAP operating earnings of $332 million compared to $302 million in 2024. For the year-to-date ended June 30, PSE&G's net income and non-GAAP operating earnings were $878 million in 2025 vs $790 million in 2024. PSEG Power & Other had second quarter 2025 net income of $253 million compared to $132 million in 2024, and non-GAAP operating earnings of $52 million vs $11 million in 2024. The nuclear fleet generated ~7.5 terawatt hours of carbon-free baseload power with an 88.8% capacity factor in Q2 2025.

View in transcript ↓

Guidance

  • Reaffirms full year 2025 non-GAAP operating earnings guidance of $3.94 to $4.06 per share, up 9% at midpoint from 2024.
  • Maintains 5-year capital spending program of $21 billion to $24 billion, supporting 6% to 7.5% rate base CAGR through 2029 and 5% to 7% non-GAAP operating earnings CAGR at nuclear PTC threshold.
  • Confident in being within the full year guidance range despite the Hope Creek outage in Q4 2025.
View in transcript ↓

Risks

  • Resource adequacy challenges in New Jersey and PJM region with growing demand and slow new supply response.
  • PJM capacity market dynamics and potential impact on customer bills.
  • Uncertainty in legislative and regulatory actions regarding generation build and resource planning in New Jersey.
View in transcript ↓

Q&A highlights

Q: David Arcaro asks about New Jersey resource adequacy and generation build conversations.

A: Ralph says they're advocating for decisions on forecasts, reliability, affordability, and environmental policies, and will help drive solutions.

Q: David Arcaro follows up on data center pipeline and nuclear plant opportunities.

A: Dan mentions ongoing discussions and interest in data centers, with CoreWeave's investment in New Jersey as an example.

Q: Nicholas Campanella asks about New Jersey generation add and multiyear contracts.

A: Ralph says they want to do a deal with the state but won't rush, and Dan talks about monitoring capacity and energy markets.

Q: Michael Sullivan asks about New Jersey supply options and JV consideration.

A: Ralph says not interested in merchant generation, and Dan mentions PJM process discussions.

Q: Michael Sullivan asks about OB3 benefits and tax credits.

A: Dan explains bonus depreciation helps cash flow but is marginal, and PTC retention is key.

Q: Randy asks about New Jersey supply and JV.

A: Ralph says not interested in merchant generation, and Dan mentions PJM governors meeting next month.

Q: Carly Davenport asks about large load inquiries conversion rate and 2025 earnings growth.

A: Ralph says ~10%-20% conversion rate holds, and Dan notes halfway point earnings above expectations but Hope Creek outage will be a drag.

Q: Ryan Levine asks about customer bill deferral and large load projects.

A: Ralph says no current plan, and Dan explains PJM auction impact on bills.

Q: Travis Miller asks about regulated generation FERC approval and resource adequacy debate.

A: Ralph says no FERC approval needed, and Dan talks about past reliability, affordability, and environmental concerns.

Q: Paul Fremont asks about CoreWeave relationship and cogeneration.

A: Ralph says CoreWeave relates to the utility, and details on cogeneration are with site management.

Q: Julien Dumoulin-Smith asks about energy storage participation and PJM governance.

A: Ralph says energy storage is part of all-of-the-above, and PJM governance is a process needing member votes.

Q: Paul Patterson asks about legislative action and battery economics.

A: Ralph says momentum for solutions exists, and battery economics are merchant-based with pending BPU action.

View in transcript ↓

Key numbers

Reported versus consensus

Earnings calendar feed

MetricReportedConsensusDeltaPrior year
EPS
Revenue

Transcript

August 5, 2025

Full transcript unavailable for redistribution

The structured summary above covers the available call sections. Full transcript text is not included on this page.

Continue exploring

Prior quarters

This page presents the stored structured earnings-call summary and deterministic earnings calendar values. How this is generated. For informational purposes only; not investment advice.