MGIC Investment Corporation
MGIC Investment Corporation Q4 FY2025 earnings call
February 3, 2026 · fiscal period ended 2025-12
EPS · actual vs est
Revenue · actual vs est
Summary
Generated 2026-02-03
Management highlights
- Delivered solid financial results, closing 2025 strong with net income of $169 million in Q4 and $738 million for the full year.
- Insurance in force ended the year at over $303 billion, up 3% y/y, with $17 billion of new insurance written in Q4 and $60 billion full-year, up 8% y/y.
- Reinsurance program bolstered with various transactions, including a $250 million excess of loss transaction and a 40% quota share transaction, reducing PMIERs required by $2.8 billion or 47%.
- Returned $915 million to shareholders in 2025 through share repurchases and dividends, with a quarterly common stock dividend of $0.15 per share approved in January.
- Focus on housing affordability, supporting responsible policy changes, and private mortgage insurance's role in enabling low down payment borrowers.
Segment performance
In the fourth quarter, MGIC Investment Corporation earned net income of $169 million, with an annualized 13% return on equity. For the full year, net income was $738 million and return on equity was 14.3%. Book value per share grew to $23.47, 13% higher year over year. Insurance in force ended the year at more than $303 billion, up 3% from the prior year. Annual persistency was 85%. The company wrote $17 billion of new insurance in the fourth quarter and $60 billion for the full year, an increase of 8% from the prior year. The in-force premium yield was 38 basis points in the quarter, and investment income totaled $62 million in the fourth quarter with a book yield on the investment portfolio of 4%. Underwriting and other expenses in the quarter were $46 million, down from $49 million in the prior year's fourth quarter.
Guidance
- Expect insurance in force to remain relatively flat in 2026; if mortgage rates drop more than predicted, MI market could benefit but growth in insurance in force would be offset by lower persistency.
- Expect operating expenses to decline further to a range of $190 to $200 million in 2026 due to higher expected ceding commissions from renegotiated reinsurance treaties.
Risks
- Variability in credit performance of the insurance portfolio, though early payment defaults remain low.
- Market conditions affecting the size of the MI market and persistency, which could impact insurance in force growth.
- Uncertainty around future losses and their impact on profit commissions related to quota share deals, making modeling of ceded premiums challenging.
Q&A highlights
Q: Any price competition or changes seen in the industry?
A: Timothy James Mattke stated they feel good about premium stability, with no major adjustments in the quarter.
Q: Thoughts on potential reduction in FHA premiums?
A: Timothy James Mattke said there's no imminent indication of FHA premium reduction, but external pressure exists for affordability.
Q: Credit trends by region or state?
A: Nathaniel Howe Colson said no significant geographic movement in new delinquencies seen.
Q: Reserve release composition and drivers?
A: Nathaniel Howe Colson explained reserve development driven by cure rates on recent delinquency notices, with cure rates exceeding expectations.
Q: Composition of NODs and impact of newer vintages?
A: Nathaniel Howe Colson noted no major divergence in cure activity by vintage, with recent vintages tracking close to prior trends.
Q: Levers to improve returns on capital?
A: Nathaniel Howe Colson mentioned reinsurance program bolstered to improve risk-adjusted returns on equity.
Q: In-force premium yield decline?
A: Nathaniel Howe Colson said it was due to temporary factors like insurance in force dollars increasing at quarter end.
Q: Insurance in force flatness and persistency?
A: Timothy James Mattke noted refi activity can have downward pressure on persistency even with market growth.
Q: Credit trends for 2026-2027?
A: Nathaniel Howe Colson said next vintages may be modestly higher, with potential upside risk to NIW from refi volume.
Q: Modeling ceded premium and profit commission?
A: Nathaniel Howe Colson said profit commission is dependent on future loss expectations, with variability due to business nature.
Key numbers
Reported versus consensus
Earnings calendar feed
| Metric | Reported | Consensus | Delta | Prior year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPS | — | — | — | — |
| Revenue | — | — | — | — |
Transcript
February 3, 2026Full transcript unavailable for redistribution
The structured summary above covers the available call sections. Full transcript text is not included on this page.
Continue exploring
Prior quarters
This page presents the stored structured earnings-call summary and deterministic earnings calendar values. How this is generated. For informational purposes only; not investment advice.