Skip to content
MMI

Marcus & Millichap, Inc.

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. Q1 FY2026 earnings call

May 7, 2026 · fiscal period ended 2026-03

EPS · actual vs est

$-0.08 / $-0.08Inline +0.0%

Revenue · actual vs est

$171.5M / $162.2MBeat +5.7%
Ask about this call

Summary

Generated 2026-05-07

Management highlights

  • Revenue grew 18% year-over-year with brokerage up 12% and financing up 48%. Adjusted EBITDA improved to nearly $3 million from a loss of nearly $9 million a year ago.
  • MMI completed nearly 1,400 brokerage transactions in the first quarter, a 15% increase. Transactions per agent increased 11%. Seven of 11 property types serviced had brokerage revenue growth. Office, multifamily, etc. had strong activity.
  • Private client brokerage revenue improved 13% year-over-year. Larger transaction segment had a 25% revenue increase in the quarter, reversing last year's decline.
  • Financing revenue was $27 million, a 48% increase, with total financing volume up 60% across nearly 400 transactions. Average deal size increased 36%.
  • Auction revenue nearly doubled year-over-year, and revenue from loan sales and IPA capital markets increased 39%. Headcount ended the quarter with 1,621 investment brokers, up 87 from the first quarter of 2025.
  • Technology investments in AI to drive efficiency; balance sheet strong with $335 million in cash and no debt.
View in transcript ↓

Segment performance

Real estate brokerage commissions for the first quarter were $138 million, an increase of 12% year-over-year and accounted for 81% of total revenue. They completed 1,348 brokerage transactions with a total volume of $7.9 billion, up 15% and 19% respectively. Within brokerage, the core private client market accounted for 64% of brokerage revenue, $88 million, up 13% year-over-year. Revenue from the larger transaction segment (deals above $20 million) was $25 million, a 25% increase year-over-year. Financing revenue was $27 million in the first quarter, an increase of 48% compared to the prior year quarter, driven by 60% growth in dollar volume to $3.1 billion across 398 financing transactions. Other revenue, including leasing, consulting, etc., was $6.5 million in the first quarter, an increase of 98% compared to the prior year, primarily reflecting growth in loan sales and advisory services.

View in transcript ↓

Guidance

  • Second quarter revenue expected to reflect continued year-over-year improvement building on Q1 momentum.
  • Cost of services in the second quarter is expected to remain in the range of 62 to 63.5% of revenue.
  • SG&A in the second quarter should reflect modest year-over-year growth in absolute dollars driven by continued investment in agent support programs and technology infrastructure.
  • Tax expense is anticipated to be in the range of $500,000 to $1.5 million for the second quarter.
View in transcript ↓

Risks

  • General economic conditions and commercial real estate market conditions.
  • Ability to retain and attract transactional professionals.
  • Retaining business philosophy and partnership culture amid competitive pressures.
  • Integrating new agents and sustaining growth.
  • Geopolitical and macroeconomic variables which could moderate the pace of activity.
View in transcript ↓

Q&A highlights

Q: Isama, are your customers more immune to rate movements, given that it seems to be kind of part of their everyday life at this point?

A: No, they're not immune, and they're actually very sensitive to it. The pent-up demand for transactions is trumping the interest rate volatility effect.

Q: I think you mentioned 188 unique lenders, if I'm not mistaken, this quarter. I know you probably don't have the number in front of you, but I'm just curious, kind of where did that stand, maybe two, three years ago?

A: It tightened down quite a bit in 2023 and 2024, but saw significant improvement in the last two quarters with banks and credit unions returning.

Q: Larger transaction activity, clearly pretty decent amount of growth this quarter. Was that a function of your hiring, or do you think that just the price expectations amongst the sellers have become a bit more reasonable, or did both basically contribute to that?

A: Contributions from both factors. Predominantly, transactions that didn't consummate last year due to a pricing gap cleared the market in Q1, and a number of our clients that had been hesitant to bring product to market because the pricing expectation just wasn't going to be met, capitulated to more realistic price expectations.

View in transcript ↓

Key numbers

Reported versus consensus

Earnings calendar feed

MetricReportedConsensusDeltaPrior year
EPS$-0.08$-0.08+0.0%
Revenue$171.5M$162.2M+5.7%

Transcript

May 7, 2026

Full transcript unavailable for redistribution

The structured summary above covers the available call sections. Full transcript text is not included on this page.

Continue exploring

Prior quarters

This page presents the stored structured earnings-call summary and deterministic earnings calendar values. How this is generated. For informational purposes only; not investment advice.