Energy Transfer LP
Energy Transfer LP Q3 FY2025 earnings call
November 6, 2025 · fiscal period ended 2025-09
EPS · actual vs est
Revenue · actual vs est
Summary
Generated 2025-11-06
Management highlights
- Financial Performance: Adjusted EBITDA for Q3 2025 was $3.84 billion, down from $3.96 billion in the prior year; year-to-date adjusted EBITDA was $11.8 billion vs $11.6 billion in 2024. DCF attributable to partners was approximately $1.9 billion. Organic growth capital spent in the first 9 months of 2025 was ~$3.1 billion. - Segment-Specific: NGL and refined products saw higher throughput; midstream excluded a one-time claim for growth; crude oil had growth in some pipelines but lower transportation revenues; interstate natural gas had a tax resolution impact; intrastate natural gas affected by volume growth and contract shifts. - Key Projects: Desert Southwest pipeline expansion fully contracted with potential capacity increase; Hugh Brinson Pipeline Phase 1 on track for 2026, Phase 2 planned; Bethel natural gas storage expansion to double capacity; data center and power plant agreements signed with major companies; Permian processing plants in service with expansions; crude oil terminal expansion underway; Lake Charles LNG in advanced discussions for equity and offtake agreements.
Segment performance
In the third quarter of 2025, Energy Transfer's NGL and refined products segment achieved an adjusted EBITDA of $1.1 billion, compared to $1 billion in the same period of the previous year. The midstream segment reported an adjusted EBITDA of $751 million, versus $816 million in Q3 2024. Excluding a $70 million one-time business interruption claim from the prior year, midstream would have shown growth due to higher volumes in the Permian Basin. The crude oil segment had an adjusted EBITDA of $746 million, down from $768 million in Q3 2024, with growth in some pipelines offset by lower transportation revenues. The interstate natural gas segment recorded an adjusted EBITDA of $431 million, versus $460 million in Q3 2024, with a $43 million tax resolution impacting the result. The intrastate natural gas segment reported an adjusted EBITDA of $230 million, compared to $329 million in Q3 2024, affected by volume growth and a shift to more long-term contracts.
Guidance
Energy Transfer expects to be slightly below the lower end of the guidance range of $16.1 billion to $16.5 billion. The company is well-positioned with growth projects backed by high-quality counterparties, focusing on capital discipline to ensure projects meet risk/return criteria.
Risks
- Market conditions could impact contract rates for various projects. - Uncertainties remain with Lake Charles LNG FID, dependent on securing 80% equity partners and converting nonbinding heads of agreement to binding ones. - Potential challenges in project execution and meeting risk/return thresholds for the LNG project.
Q&A highlights
Q: Clarify if guidance includes Parkland acquisition?
A: Dylan Bramhall states that guidance does not include Parkland, and the company expects to be slightly below the initial guide without Parkland.
Q: More detail on Lake Charles LNG contracts and FID timing?
A: Mackie McCrea explains that Lake Charles LNG FID is dependent on securing 80% equity partners and converting nonbinding heads of agreement to binding ones, with work ongoing to reach this milestone.
Q: Financial impact of data center deals?
A: Marshall McCrea mentions that data centers are an impetus, with a significant amount of the $25 billion revenue from demand pull including data centers, and Hugh Brinson being a key profitable asset.
Q: Consideration of converting NGL pipe to natural gas service?
A: Mackie McCrea says Energy Transfer constantly evaluates assets, with NGL contracts approaching cliffs, and considering conversion for potentially higher revenue.
Q: Crude oil agreements with Enbridge and earnings impact?
A: Mackie McCrea notes that teaming with Enbridge is beneficial as it aligns well with contract roll-offs, helping to keep Dakota Access full.
Q: Growth backlog and CapEx?
A: Thomas Long states that Energy Transfer has a great backlog of high-returning projects, with $5 billion planned for organic growth capital in 2026, but specific numbers are not provided.
Q: Desert Southwest pipeline upsizing?
A: Mackie McCrea says Desert Southwest pipeline is fully contracted with potential to increase capacity, working on decisions regarding pipe size in the next few weeks.
Q: Gas storage expansion and rates?
A: Marshall McCrea says gas storage rates are high, with Bethel expansion being unique, and storage being a key area with potential for more expansions.
Q: Capital outlay for data center supply projects?
A: Marshall McCrea explains that many data center projects have low capital, often embedded in existing or new projects.
Q: Lake Charles LNG FID certainty and timing?
A: Mackie McCrea states that Lake Charles LNG will not proceed until 80% equity partners are secured, with work ongoing to meet this requirement.
Q: Hugh Brinson supply and demand breakout?
A: Mackie McCrea says Hugh Brinson started as demand pull, now balanced with producer push and demand pull.
Q: 6 Bs of new gas deals and margin?
A: Dylan Bramhall says the 6 Bs of new deals are incremental, made up of different contracts with a strong weighted average fee.
Q: Data center connections to power grid expediting?
A: Marshall McCrea says if data center connections to power grid are expedited, it would boost pipeline business, beneficial for natural gas demand
Key numbers
Reported versus consensus
Earnings calendar feed
| Metric | Reported | Consensus | Delta | Prior year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPS | — | — | — | — |
| Revenue | — | — | — | — |
Transcript
November 6, 2025Full transcript unavailable for redistribution
The structured summary above covers the available call sections. Full transcript text is not included on this page.
Continue exploring
Prior quarters
This page presents the stored structured earnings-call summary and deterministic earnings calendar values. How this is generated. For informational purposes only; not investment advice.